Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27938636›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of circumpolar health2016

Performance indicators for maternity care in a circumpolar context: a scoping review.

Rebecca Rich, Thomsen D'Hont, Janice Linton, Kellie E Murphy, Jeremy Veillard, Susan Chatwood

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of circumpolar health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Engaging with the All My Relations Advisory Board in a healthy food incentive randomized controlled trial: a qualitative process evaluation.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Rebecca RichInstitute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Thomsen D'HontInstitute for Circumpolar Health Research, Yellowknife, Canada.
Janice LintonNeil John Maclean Health Sciences Library, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Kellie E MurphyInstitute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Jeremy VeillardInstitute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Susan ChatwoodInstitute for Circumpolar Health Research, Yellowknife, Canada.
University of Toronto · CAInstitute for Circumpolar Health Research · CAMount Sinai Hospital · CAPublic Health Ontario · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

CIHR 201511PEGCIHR TT6-128271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn circumpolar regions, harsh climates and scattered populations have prompted the centralization of care and reduction of local maternity services. The resulting practice of routine evacuation for birth from smaller towns to larger urban centres points to a potential conflict between the necessity to ensure patient safety and the importance of delivering services that are responsive to the health needs and values of populations served.

objectiveTo identify recommended performance/quality indicators for use in circumpolar maternity care systems.

methodsWe searched Scopus, Ebscohost databases (including Academic Search Complete and CINAHL), the Global Health Database, High North Research Documents, and online grey literature. Articles were included if they focused on maternal health indicators in the population of interest (Indigenous women, women receiving care in circumpolar or remote regions). Articles were excluded if they were not related to pregnancy, birth or the immediate post-partum or neonatal periods. Two reviewers independently reviewed articles for inclusion and extracted relevant data.

resultsTwenty-six documents were included. Twelve were government documents, seven were review articles or indicator compilations, four were indicator sets recommended by academics or non-governmental organizations and three were research papers. We extracted and categorized 81 unique health indicators. The majority of indicators reflected health systems processes and outcomes during the antenatal and intra-partum periods. Only two governmental indicator sets explicitly considered the needs of Indigenous peoples.

conclusionsThis review demonstrates that, although most circumpolar health systems engage in performance reporting for maternity care, efforts to capture local priorities and values are limited in most regions. Future work in this area should involve northern stakeholders in the process of indicator selection and development.

Indexed as

Arctic RegionsFemaleHumansInuitMaternal Health ServicesPregnancyQuality Indicators, Health Carecircumpolarhealthhealth care qualityindicatorIndigenousperformance measurement

Identifiers

PMID27938636
PMCPMC5149666
OpenAlexW2560518435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.