Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27938489›Full record

ArticleCell transplantation2017

A Comparative Study of Three Different Types of Stem Cells for Treatment of Rat Spinal Cord Injury.

Jiri Ruzicka, Lucia Machova-Urdzikova, John Gillick, Takashi Amemori, Nataliya Romanyuk, Kristyna Karova, Kristyna Zaviskova, Jana Dubisova, Sarka Kubinova, Raj Murali and 3 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cell transplantation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Wrap it up: myelination of transplanted neurons for repair.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Spinal cord injury: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic interventions.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Animal models of compression spinal cord injury.Journal of neuroscience research · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Cell transplantation to repair the injured spinal cord.International review of neurobiology · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jiri Ruzicka
Lucia Machova-Urdzikova
John Gillick
Takashi Amemori
Nataliya Romanyuk
Kristyna Karova
Kristyna Zaviskova
Jana Dubisova
Sarka Kubinova
Raj Murali
Eva Sykova
Meena Jhanwar-Uniyal
Pavla Jendelova

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three different sources of human stem cells-bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs), neural progenitors (NPs) derived from immortalized spinal fetal cell line (SPC-01), and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs)-were compared in the treatment of a balloon-induced spinal cord compression lesion in rats. One week after lesioning, the rats received either BM-MSCs (intrathecally) or NPs (SPC-01 cells or iPSC-NPs, both intraspinally), or saline. The rats were assessed for their locomotor skills (BBB, flat beam test, and rotarod). Morphometric analyses of spared white and gray matter, axonal sprouting, and glial scar formation, as well as qPCR and Luminex assay, were conducted to detect endogenous gene expression, while inflammatory cytokine levels were performed to evaluate the host tissue response to stem cell therapy. The highest locomotor recovery was observed in iPSC-NP-grafted animals, which also displayed the highest amount of preserved white and gray matter. Grafted iPSC-NPs and SPC-01 cells significantly increased the number of growth-associated protein 43 (GAP43+) axons, reduced astrogliosis, downregulated Casp3 expression, and increased IL-6 and IL-12 levels. hMSCs transiently decreased levels of inflammatory IL-2 and TNF-α. These findings correlate with the short survival of hMSCs, while NPs survived for 2 months and matured slowly into glia- and tissue-specific neuronal precursors. SPC-01 cells differentiated more in astroglial phenotypes with a dense structure of the implant, whereas iPSC-NPs displayed a more neuronal phenotype with a loose structure of the graft. We concluded that the BBB scores of iPSC-NP- and hMSC-injected rats were superior to the SPC-01-treated group. The iPSC-NP treatment of spinal cord injury (SCI) provided the highest recovery of locomotor function due to robust graft survival and its effect on tissue sparing, reduction of glial scarring, and increased axonal sprouting.

Indexed as

Stem Cell TransplantationAnimalsAxonsCell DifferentiationCell LineageCell ShapeCell SurvivalCytokinesGene Expression RegulationGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinGliosisGray MatterHumansImmunohistochemistryMacrophagesMaleCytokinesGlial Fibrillary Acidic Protein

Identifiers

PMID27938489
PMCPMC5661215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.