Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27938400›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2016

Developing the ethics of implementation research in health.

Vijayaprasad Gopichandran, Valerie A Luyckx, Nikola Biller-Andorno, Amy Fairchild, Jerome Singh, Nhan Tran, Abha Saxena, Pascal Launois, Andreas Reis, Dermot Maher and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Ethical Challenges in International Trials.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Ethical Issues in Breastfeeding and Lactation Interventions: A Scoping Review.Journal of human lactation : official journal of International Lactation Consultant Association · 2024
    Article
  10. Inequities in kidney health and kidney care.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Consent Requirements for Testing Health Policies: An Intercontinental Comparison of Expert Opinions.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Vijayaprasad GopichandranDepartment of Community Medicine, ESIC Medical College and Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, KK Nagar, Chennai, 600078, India. vijay.gopichandran@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2635-9583
Valerie A LuyckxInstitute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, Center for Medical Humanities, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 30, CH-8006, Zurich, Switzerland.
Nikola Biller-AndornoInstitute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, Center for Medical Humanities, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 30, CH-8006, Zurich, Switzerland.
Amy FairchildAssociate Dean of Academic Affairs, Texas A & M School of Public Health, College Station, Texas, USA.
Jerome SinghUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal, Nelson Mandela School of Medicine, 719 Umbilo Road, Durban, 4001, South Africa.
Nhan TranAlliance for Health Systems and Policy Research, World Health Organization, 20, Avenue Appia, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Abha SaxenaGlobal Health Ethics Unit, World Health Organization, 20, Avenue Appia, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Pascal LaunoisSpecial Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (WHO/TDR), Geneva, Switzerland.
Andreas ReisGlobal Health Ethics Unit, World Health Organization, 20, Avenue Appia, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Dermot MaherSpecial Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (WHO/TDR), Geneva, Switzerland.
Mahnaz VahediSpecial Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (WHO/TDR), Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implementation research (IR) is growing in recognition as an important generator of practical knowledge that can be translated into health policy. With its aim to answer questions about how to improve access to interventions that have been shown to work but have not reached many of the people who could benefit from them, IR involves a range of particular ethical considerations that have not yet been comprehensively covered in international guidelines on health research ethics. The fundamental ethical principles governing clinical research apply equally in IR, but the application of these principles may differ depending on the IR question, context, and the nature of the proposed intervention. IR questions cover a broad range of topics that focus on improving health system functioning and improving equitable and just access to effective health care interventions. As such, IR designs are flexible and often innovative, and ethical principles cannot simply be extrapolated from their applications in clinical research. Meaningful engagement with all stakeholders including communities and research participants is a fundamental ethical requirement that cuts across all study phases of IR and links most ethical concerns. Careful modification of the informed consent process may be required in IR to permit study of a needed intervention. The risks associated with IR may be difficult to anticipate and may be very context-specific. The benefits of IR may not accrue to the same groups who participate in the research, therefore justifying the risks versus benefits of IR may be ethically challenging. The expectation that knowledge generated through IR should be rapidly translated into health policy and practice necessitates up-front commitments from decision-makers to sustainability and scalability of effective interventions. Greater awareness of the particular ethical implications of the features of IR is urgently needed to facilitate optimal ethical conduct of IR and uniform ethical review.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchEthics, ResearchResearch DesignHumans

Identifiers

PMID27938400
PMCPMC5148832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.