ArticleImplementation science : IS2016
Developing the ethics of implementation research in health.
Article in Implementation science : IS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed.
- What constitutes risk in implementation research? Perspectives from a qualitative key-informant study.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Ethical considerations in implementation research: a scoping review of key principles, unintended consequences, and emerging ethical guidance.Implementation science communications · 2025Review
- Ethical Challenges in International Trials.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2025Article
- Gaps in the Ottawa Statement on the Ethical Design and Conduct of Cluster Randomized Trials: a citation analysis reveals a need for updated ethics guidelines.Research integrity and peer review · 2025Article
- Challenges in Healthcare Research in Nepal: What is the way forward?Nepal journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- Uniting disciplines against antimicrobial resistance (AMR): highlights from a multidisciplinary inaugural AMR summit.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025Review
- Ethical issues in implementation science: perspectives from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop.Implementation science : IS · 2024Article
- Post-trial responsibilities in pragmatic clinical trials: Fulfilling the promise of research to drive real-world change.Learning health systems · 2024Article
- Ethical Issues in Breastfeeding and Lactation Interventions: A Scoping Review.Journal of human lactation : official journal of International Lactation Consultant Association · 2024Article
- Inequities in kidney health and kidney care.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2023Review
- mHealth to improve implementation of TB contact investigation: a case study from Uganda.Implementation science communications · 2023Article
- Capacity building through comprehensive implementation research training and mentorship: an approach for translating knowledge into practice.Globalization and health · 2023Article
- Consent Requirements for Testing Health Policies: An Intercontinental Comparison of Expert Opinions.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2022Article
- A guide to systems-level, participatory, theory-informed implementation research in global health.BMJ global health · 2021Article
- From informed consent to adherence: factors influencing involvement in mass drug administration with ivermectin for malaria elimination in The Gambia.Malaria journal · 2021Article
- Value of peer mentoring for early career professional, research, and personal development: a case study of implementation scientists.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2021Article
- Sustainable Development Goals relevant to kidney health: an update on progress.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2021Review
- Ethical Dimensions of Public Health Actions and Policies With Special Focus on COVID-19.Frontiers in public health · 2021Review
- Change and choice: research and evidence-informed policy.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2021Article
- Meeting Indigenous youth where they are at: knowing and doing with 2SLGBTTQQIA and gender non-conforming Indigenous youth: a qualitative case study.BMC public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Implementation research (IR) is growing in recognition as an important generator of practical knowledge that can be translated into health policy. With its aim to answer questions about how to improve access to interventions that have been shown to work but have not reached many of the people who could benefit from them, IR involves a range of particular ethical considerations that have not yet been comprehensively covered in international guidelines on health research ethics. The fundamental ethical principles governing clinical research apply equally in IR, but the application of these principles may differ depending on the IR question, context, and the nature of the proposed intervention. IR questions cover a broad range of topics that focus on improving health system functioning and improving equitable and just access to effective health care interventions. As such, IR designs are flexible and often innovative, and ethical principles cannot simply be extrapolated from their applications in clinical research. Meaningful engagement with all stakeholders including communities and research participants is a fundamental ethical requirement that cuts across all study phases of IR and links most ethical concerns. Careful modification of the informed consent process may be required in IR to permit study of a needed intervention. The risks associated with IR may be difficult to anticipate and may be very context-specific. The benefits of IR may not accrue to the same groups who participate in the research, therefore justifying the risks versus benefits of IR may be ethically challenging. The expectation that knowledge generated through IR should be rapidly translated into health policy and practice necessitates up-front commitments from decision-makers to sustainability and scalability of effective interventions. Greater awareness of the particular ethical implications of the features of IR is urgently needed to facilitate optimal ethical conduct of IR and uniform ethical review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.