Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27938375›Full record

Trial reportTrials2016

Effectiveness of a girls' empowerment programme on early childbearing, marriage and school dropout among adolescent girls in rural Zambia: study protocol for a cluster randomized trial.

Ingvild Fossgard Sandøy, Mweetwa Mudenda, Joseph Zulu, Ecloss Munsaka, Astrid Blystad, Mpundu C Makasa, Ottar Mæstad, Bertil Tungodden, Choolwe Jacobs, Linda Kampata and 5 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ingvild Fossgard SandøyCenter for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health (CISMAC), Centre for International Health (CIH), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. ingvild.sandoy@uib.no.ORCID 0000-0001-5567-4588
Mweetwa MudendaCenter for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health (CISMAC), Centre for International Health (CIH), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Joseph ZuluCenter for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health (CISMAC), Centre for International Health (CIH), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Ecloss MunsakaCenter for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health (CISMAC), Centre for International Health (CIH), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Astrid BlystadCenter for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health (CISMAC), Centre for International Health (CIH), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Mpundu C MakasaCenter for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health (CISMAC), Centre for International Health (CIH), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Ottar MæstadCenter for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health (CISMAC), Centre for International Health (CIH), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Bertil TungoddenCenter for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health (CISMAC), Centre for International Health (CIH), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Choolwe JacobsCenter for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health (CISMAC), Centre for International Health (CIH), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Linda KampataCenter for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health (CISMAC), Centre for International Health (CIH), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Knut FylkesnesCenter for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health (CISMAC), Centre for International Health (CIH), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Joar SvanemyrCenter for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health (CISMAC), Centre for International Health (CIH), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Karen Marie MolandCenter for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health (CISMAC), Centre for International Health (CIH), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Richard BandaCentre for International Health, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Patrick MusondaCenter for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health (CISMAC), Centre for International Health (CIH), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescent pregnancies pose a risk to the young mothers and their babies. In Zambia, 35% of young girls in rural areas have given birth by the age of 18 years. Pregnancy rates are particularly high among out-of-school girls. Poverty, low enrolment in secondary school, myths and community norms all contribute to early childbearing. This protocol describes a trial aiming to measure the effect on early childbearing rates in a rural Zambian context of (1) economic support to girls and their families, and (2) combining economic support with a community intervention to enhance knowledge about sexual and reproductive health and supportive community norms. METHODS/

designThis cluster randomized controlled trial (CRCT) will have three arms. The clusters are rural schools with surrounding communities. Approximately 4900 girls in grade 7 in 2016 will be recruited from 157 schools in 12 districts. In one intervention arm, participating girls and their guardians will be offered cash transfers and payment of school fees. In the second intervention arm, there will be both economic support and a community intervention. The interventions will be implemented for approximately 2 years. The final survey will be 4.5 years after recruitment. The primary outcomes will be "incidence of births within 8 months of the end of the intervention period", "incidence of births before girls' 18th birthday" and "proportion of girls who sit for the grade 9 exam". Final survey interviewers will be unaware of the intervention status of respondents. Analysis will be by intention-to-treat and adjusted for cluster design and confounders. Qualitative process evaluation will be conducted. DISCUSSION: This is the first CRCT to measure the effect of combining economic support with a community intervention to prevent adolescent childbearing in a low- or middle-income country. We have designed a programme that will be sustainable and feasible to scale up. The findings will be relevant for programmes for adolescent reproductive health in Zambia and similar contexts.

trial registrationISRCTN registry: ISRCTN12727868 , (4 March 2016).

Indexed as

Adolescent Health ServicesMarriageParturitionPower, PsychologicalRural Health ServicesSchool Health ServicesStudent DropoutsAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorAge FactorsCluster AnalysisFemaleHealth BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansIncomeAdolescent pregnancyCash transferCommunity dialogueEarly marriageEconomic supportPovertySchool dropoutSchool enrolmentSexual and reproductive health

Identifiers

PMID27938375
PMCPMC5148869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.