Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27938341›Full record

SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2016

Fetal membrane imaging and the prediction of preterm birth: a systematic review, current issues, and future directions.

Vanessa Nunes, Jennifer Cross, John E Speich, Danielle R Morgan, Jerome F Strauss, Ronald M Ramus

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Frontiers in physiology · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vanessa NunesDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Jennifer CrossDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
John E SpeichDepartment of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, School of Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Danielle R MorganDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Jerome F StraussDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Ronald M RamusDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA. ronald.ramus@vcuhealth.org.
Virginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

Admixture Mapping of Preterm Birth GenesR01HD073555 · NICHD · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI STRAUSS, JEROME F · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD073555
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) is the largest identifiable cause of preterm birth. There is currently no good screening test for PPROM in low-risk asymptomatic patients. Our goal was to identify how imaging methods can be utilized for examining the risks for PPROM in asymptomatic patients.

methodsThis paper is a systematic review of the literature on fetal membrane thickness and its use for the prediction of PPROM. Four key studies are identified and reviewed; two in vitro studies and two in vivo ultrasound studies each using differing methodologies. Additionally reviewed is a study using Optical Coherence Tomography, an emerging technique using near-infrared technology to produce high-resolution images.

resultsThere is currently insufficient data to determine the association between fetal membrane thickness and PPROM by ultrasound.

conclusionsFetal membrane thickness could have relevant clinical ramifications for the prediction of PPROM. Suggested improvements in study methodology and design will lead to progress in this area of research, as well as the use of newer technologies. Larger sample sizes, histological comparison, uniform methodologies for data collection, longitudinal study design and expanding data analysis beyond fetal membrane thickness to other properties would expand our knowledge in this field. In addition, transvaginal ultrasound should be utilized to improve resolution, as well as emerging methodologies such as MRI fusion imaging using ultrasound and Shear Wave Elastography.

Indexed as

Ultrasonography, PrenatalElasticity Imaging TechniquesExtraembryonic MembranesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPredictive Value of TestsPregnancyPremature Rupture of Fetal MembranesRisk AssessmentTomography, Optical CoherenceAmnionChorionFetal membranePremature rupture of membranesPreterm birthPreterm premature rupture of membranesPROMUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID27938341
PMCPMC5148829
OpenAlexW2560266805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.