Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27938339›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2016

Bayesian reversible-jump for epistasis analysis in genomic studies.

Marcio Balestre, Claudio Lopes de Souza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. An approximate Bayesian significance test for genomic evaluations.Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marcio BalestreDepartment of Statistics- Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, MG, CP 3037, Brazil. marciobalestre@dex.ufla.br.
Claudio Lopes de SouzaDepartmento de Genética, Escola de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, Universidade de São Paulo, (ESALQ-USP) Piracicaba, São Paulo, 13400-970 CP 83, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe large amount of data used in genomic analysis has allowed geneticists to achieve some understanding of the genetic architecture of complex traits. Although the information gathered by molecular markers has permitted gains in predictive accuracy and gene discovery, epistatic effects have been ignored based on exhaustive searches requesting estimates of its effects on the whole genome. In this work, we propose the reversible-jump technique to estimate epistasis in the genome without drastically altering the model dimension. To this end, we used a real maize dataset based on 256 F

resultsOur model explored 18,624 candidate epistases, but even in this vast space, only one spurious interaction was found. The three epistases selected by our model, named here as 18x26, 56x68 and 59x93, were very close to simulated ones (19x25, 54x72, 59x91 and 59x94). In the real dataset, we estimate 33,024 epistatic effects, and several minor epistatic combinations were found to explain a significant proportion of the genetic variance. The broad participation of epistasis in the real dataset may indicate the presence of pervasive epistasis acting on maize grain yield.

conclusionsThe power of selecting true epistasis in thousands of possible combinations suggests the attractiveness of our model to handle genomic data.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremEpistasis, GeneticGenomicsModels, GeneticGenetic LinkageLod ScoreQuantitative Trait, HeritableQuantitative Trait LociSelection, GeneticZea maysBayesian analysisGenome-wide studiesMaizeQTL

Identifiers

PMID27938339
PMCPMC5148921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.