Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27936874›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine2017

Effects of Physician-targeted Pay for Performance on Use of Spontaneous Breathing Trials in Mechanically Ventilated Patients.

Ian J Barbash, Francis Pike, Scott R Gunn, Christopher W Seymour, Jeremy M Kahn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Psychological Safety in Intensive Care Unit Rounding Teams.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Bringing implementation science to the intensive care unit.Current opinion in critical care · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Changing Intensivists' Behaviors: A Challenge in Need of New Solutions.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ian J Barbash1 Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine and.
Francis Pike2 Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and.
Scott R Gunn2 Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and.
Christopher W Seymour2 Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and.
Jeremy M Kahn1 Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine and.

Funding

Translational Training Program in Pulmonary Biology and MedicineT32HL007563 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Melanie Koenigshoff · 1985 to 2026
$12.3M
Sepsis subtypes: biology, treatment, and bedside applicationR35GM119519 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Christopher W. Seymour · 2016 to 2026
$4.9M
Patient Oriented Research and Mentoring in Critical Care Implementation ScienceK24HL133444 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KAHN, JEREMY M · 2016 to 2018
$348k
The impact of variation in the ICU bed supply on utilization of intensive care servicesF32HL132461 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BARBASH, IAN · 2016 to 2017
$108k
NHLBI NIH HHS F32 HL132461NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL133444NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007563NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM119519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationalePay for performance is an increasingly common quality improvement strategy despite the absence of robust supporting evidence.

objectivesTo determine the impact of a financial incentive program rewarding physicians for the completion of daily spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs) in three academic hospitals.

methodsWe compared data from mechanically ventilated patients from 6 months before to 2 years after introduction of a financial incentive program that provided annual payments to critical care physicians contingent on unit-level SBT completion rates. We used Poisson regression to compare the frequency of days on which SBTs were completed among eligible patients and days on which patients were excluded from SBT eligibility among all mechanically ventilated patients. We used multivariate regression to compare risk-adjusted duration of mechanical ventilation and in-hospital mortality. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsThe cohort included 7,291 mechanically ventilated patients with 75,621 ventilator days. Baseline daily SBT rates were 96.8% (hospital A), 16.4% (hospital B), and 74.7% (hospital C). In hospital A, with the best baseline performance, there was no change in SBT rates, exclusion rates, or duration of mechanical ventilation across time periods. In hospitals B and C, with lower SBT completion rates at baseline, there was an increase in daily SBT completion rates and a concomitant increase in exclusions from eligibility. Duration of mechanical ventilation decreased in hospital C but not in hospital B. Mortality was unchanged for all hospitals.

conclusionsIn hospitals with low baseline SBT completion, physician-targeted financial incentives were associated with increased SBT rates driven in part by increased exclusion rates, without consistent improvements in outcome.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysiciansReimbursement, IncentiveRetrospective StudiesVentilator Weaningcritical carehealth care qualitymechanical ventilationpay for performance

Identifiers

PMID27936874
PMCPMC5519961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.