ArticleVirulence2017
Antibodies to Staphylococcus aureus capsular polysaccharides 5 and 8 perform similarly in vitro but are functionally distinct in vivo.
Article in Virulence, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- "Swab-and-Stain" Nanoparticle Assay for Detection of PBP2a-Expressing Methicillin-ResistantMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Integrated Metagenomic and Lipidomic Profiling Reveals Dysregulation of Facial Skin Microbiome in Moderate Acne Vulgaris.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Virulence attributes of successful methicillin-resistantClinical microbiology reviews · 2023Review
- Origin of Antibiotics and Antibiotic Resistance, and Their Impacts on Drug Development: A Narrative Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Microbial Biofilm: A Review on Formation, Infection, Antibiotic Resistance, Control Measures, and Innovative Treatment.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Contribution of Extracellular Membrane Vesicles To the Secretome of Staphylococcus aureus.mBio · 2023Article
- Review
- Biofilms: Formation, drug resistance and alternatives to conventional approaches.AIMS microbiology · 2022Review
- Novel Treatments and Preventative Strategies Against Food-Poisoning Caused by Staphylococcal Species.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- MgrA Negatively Impacts Staphylococcus aureus Invasion by Regulating Capsule and FnbA.Infection and immunity · 2019Article
- A novel bispecific antibody platform to direct complement activity for efficient lysis of target cells.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Fighting Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms with Monoclonal Antibodies.Trends in microbiology · 2019Review
- Molecular epidemiology and expression of capsular polysaccharides in Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates in the United States.PloS one · 2019Article
- Release of Staphylococcus aureus extracellular vesicles and their application as a vaccine platform.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Monoclonal antibodies and bacterial virulence.Virulence · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The capsular polysaccharide (CP) produced by Staphylococcus aureus is a virulence factor that allows the organism to evade uptake and killing by host neutrophils. Polyclonal antibodies to the serotype 5 (CP5) and type 8 (CP8) capsular polysaccharides are opsonic and protect mice against experimental bacteremia provoked by encapsulated staphylococci. Thus, passive immunotherapy using CP antibodies has been considered for the prevention or treatment of invasive antibiotic-resistant S. aureus infections. In this report, we generated monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against S. aureus CP5 or CP8. Backbone specific mAbs reacted with native and O-deacetylated CPs, whereas O-acetyl specific mAbs reacted only with native CPs. Reference strains of S. aureus and a selection of clinical isolates reacted by colony immunoblot with the CP5 and CP8 mAbs in a serotype-specific manner. The mAbs mediated in vitro CP type-specific opsonophagocytic killing of S. aureus strains, and mice passively immunized with CP5 mAbs were protected against S. aureus bacteremia. Neither CP8-specific mAbs or polyclonal antibodies protected mice against bacteremia provoked by serotype 8 S. aureus clinical isolates, although these same antibodies did protect against a serotype 5 S. aureus strain genetically engineered to produce CP8. We detected soluble CP8 in culture supernatants of serotype 8 clinical isolates and in the plasma of infected animals. Serotype 5 S. aureus released significantly less soluble CP5 in vitro and in vivo. The release of soluble CP8 by S. aureus may contribute to the inability of CP8 vaccines or antibodies to protect against serotype 8 staphylococcal infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.