Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27936293›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2017

Effects of incentives for naltrexone adherence on opiate abstinence in heroin-dependent adults.

Brantley P Jarvis, August F Holtyn, Anthony DeFulio, Kelly E Dunn, Jeffrey J Everly, Jeannie-Marie S Leoutsakos, Annie Umbricht, Michael Fingerhood, George E Bigelow, Kenneth Silverman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Contingency Management for Drug Use Disorders: Meta-Analysis and Application of Tolin's Criteria.Clinical psychology : a publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Misalignment of Stakeholder Incentives in the Opioid Crisis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Brantley P JarvisDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
August F HoltynDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Anthony DeFulioDepartment of Psychology, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, USA.
Kelly E DunnDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jeffrey J EverlyDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh at Greensburg, Greensburg, PA, USA.
Jeannie-Marie S LeoutsakosDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Annie UmbrichtDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Michael FingerhoodDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
George E BigelowDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kenneth SilvermanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USUniversity of Pittsburgh at Greensburg · USWestern Michigan University · US

Funding

HUMAN BEHAVIORAL PHARMACOLOGY OF SUBSTANCE ABUSET32DA007209 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Eric C. Strain, Elise M Weerts · 1985 to 2026
$12.9M
Employment-Based Depot Naltrexone Clinical TrialR01DA019497 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SILVERMAN, KENNETH · 2005 to 2016
$6.3M
Using Cannabinoids to Enhance Opioid Analgesic Effects in HumansR01DA040644 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CAMPBELL, CLAUDIA MICHELLE, DUNN, KELLY E · 2016 to 2021
$3.4M
A118G SNP and OPRM1 Gene Opioid-Mediated Effects in HumansR01DA035246 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DUNN, KELLY E · 2014 to 2018
$3.2M
Employment-Based Addiction PharmacotherapyR01DA019386 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SILVERMAN, KENNETH · 2005 to 2009
$3.1M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA019386NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA019497NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA035246NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA040644NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo test whether an incentive-based intervention that increased adherence to naltrexone also increased opiate abstinence.

designPost-hoc combined analysis of three earlier randomized controlled trials that showed individually that incentives for adherence to oral and to extended-release injection naltrexone dosing schedules increased naltrexone adherence, but not opiate abstinence.

settingOut-patient therapeutic work-place in Baltimore, MD, USA.

participantsOne hundred and forty unemployed heroin-dependent adults participating from 2006 to 2010.

interventionsParticipants were hired in a model work-place for 26 weeks and randomized to a contingency (n = 72) or prescription (n = 68) group. Both groups were offered naltrexone. Contingency participants were required to take scheduled doses of naltrexone in order to work and earn wages. Prescription participants could earn wages independent of naltrexone adherence. MEASURES: Thrice-weekly and monthly urine samples tested for opiates and cocaine and measures of naltrexone adherence (percentage of monthly urine samples positive for naltrexone or percentage of scheduled injections received). All analyses included pre-randomization attendance, opiate use and cocaine use as covariates. Additional analyses controlled for cocaine use and naltrexone adherence during the intervention.

findingsContingency participants had more opiate abstinence than prescription participants (68.1 versus 52.9% opiate-negative thrice-weekly urine samples, respectively; and 71.9 versus 61.7% opiate-negative monthly urine samples, respectively) based on initial analyses [thrice-weekly samples, odds ratio (OR) = 3.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.7-6.5, P < 0.01; monthly samples, OR = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.0-7.1, P = 0.06] and on analyses that controlled for cocaine use (thrice-weekly samples, OR = 3.9, 95% CI = 3.3-4.5, P < 0.01; monthly samples, OR = 3.4, 95% CI = 1.1-11.1, P = 0.04), which was high and associated with opiate use. The difference in opiate abstinence rates between contingency and prescription participants was reduced when controlling for naltrexone adherence (monthly samples, OR = 1.1, 95% CI = 0.7-1.7, P = 0.84).

conclusionsIncentives for naltrexone adherence increase opiate abstinence in heroin-dependent adults, an effect that appears to be due to increased naltrexone adherence produced by the incentives.

Indexed as

MotivationAdultAmbulatory CareEmployment, SupportedFemaleHeroin DependenceHumansMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsContingency managementemploymentextended-releaseheroinmedication adherencenaltrexoneopiatesopioidstherapeutic workplace

Identifiers

PMID27936293
PMCPMC5382098
OpenAlexW2560420609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.