Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27936265›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2016

Verbal Working Memory in Older Adults: The Roles of Phonological Capacities and Processing Speed.

Susan Nittrouer, Joanna H Lowenstein, Taylor Wucinich, Aaron C Moberly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Nonword Repetition Assessing Auditory and Cognitive Abilities in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The emergence of bifurcated structure in children's language.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Verbal Working Memory in Children With Cochlear Implants.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Susan NittrouerDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, ColumbusCurrently affiliated with the University of Florida, Gainesville.
Joanna H LowensteinDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, ColumbusCurrently affiliated with the University of Florida, Gainesville.
Taylor WucinichDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
Aaron C MoberlyDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus.

Funding

The Ohio State University Center for clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001070 · NCATS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JACKSON, REBECCA D · 2013 to 2017
$22.6M
The ontogeny of segmental speech organizationR01DC000633 · NIDCD · UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY · PI NITTROUER, SUSAN · 1994 to 2015
$3.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001070NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000633
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study examined the potential roles of phonological sensitivity and processing speed in age-related declines of verbal working memory. Method: Twenty younger and 25 older adults with age-normal hearing participated. Two measures of verbal working memory were collected: digit span and serial recall of words. Processing speed was indexed using response times during those tasks. Three other measures were also obtained, assessing phonological awareness, processing, and recoding. Results: Forward and reverse digit spans were similar across groups. Accuracy on the serial recall task was poorer for older than for younger adults, and response times were slower. When response time served as a covariate, the age effect for accuracy was reduced. Phonological capacities were equivalent across age groups, so we were unable to account for differences across age groups in verbal working memory. Nonetheless, when outcomes for only older adults were considered, phonological awareness and processing speed explained significant proportions of variance in serial recall accuracy. Conclusion: Slowing in processing abilities accounts for the primary trajectory of age-related declines in verbal working memory. However, individual differences in phonological capacities explain variability among individual older adults.

Indexed as

Memory, Short-TermPhoneticsSpeech PerceptionAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCognitive AgingFemaleHearing TestsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsReaction TimeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27936265
PMCPMC5399767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.