Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27936213›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Radiologic-Histopathologic Correlation of Cerebral Microbleeds Using Pre-Mortem and Post-Mortem MRI.

Sven Haller, Marie-Louise Montandon, François Lazeyras, Max Scheffler, Stephan Meckel, Francois R Herrmann, Panteleimon Giannakopoulos, Enikö Kövari

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Postmortem 7T MRI for guided histopathology and evaluation of cerebrovascular disease.Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Role of Cerebral Microbleeds for Intracerebral Haemorrhage and Dementia.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Sven HallerAffidea Centre de Diagnostic Radiologique de Carouge CDRC, Carouge, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7433-0203
Marie-Louise MontandonMedical School of the University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
François LazeyrasDepartment of Radiology and Medical Informatics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Max SchefflerDepartment of Radiology and Medical Informatics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Stephan MeckelDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Francois R HerrmannMedical School of the University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Panteleimon GiannakopoulosMedical School of the University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Enikö KövariMedical School of the University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
University of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCerebral microbleeds (CMB), also known as cerebral microhemorrhages, are small areas of susceptibility on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), that are increasingly detected due to the higher availability of high-field MRI systems and dedicated pulse sequences. The prevalence of CMBs increases in cases with cognitive decline. The current investigation assessed the poorly investigated radiologic-histopathologic correlation of CMBs on MRI.

methodsThe local ethical committee approved the current investigation. We retrospectively assessed a consecutive series of 1303 autopsy cases hospitalized in Geneva University Hospitals between 2000-2014. Of 112 cases with pre-mortem T2* sequences, we included 25 cases (mean age 77.3 ± 9.6, 9 females) with at least one CMB. We compared pre-mortem CMBs with targeted histopathology and post-mortem MRI.

results25 cases had 31 CMB lesions detected by pre-mortem MRI. 25 additional CMB were detected on histopathology. 4 CMBs on pre-mortem MRI were false positives, resulting in a total of 52 CMBs. 27 CMBs on pre-mortem MRI were confirmed on histopathology, corresponding to a sensitivity or true positive rate of 51.9% (95% CI 37.6-66.0%). The false negative rate of pre-mortem MRI was 48.1% (95% CI 34.0-62.4%). Post-mortem MRI showed only 3 cases with additional CMBs. Overall, pre-mortem MRI significantly underestimated CMBs (p = 0.0001).

conclusionsRoutine clinical brain MRI underestimates the prevalence of CMBs by approximately 50%, and 12% of radiologic pre-mortem MRI CMBs were false positives. Post-mortem MRI confirmed that this discordance is not explained by microbleeds occurring after the pre-mortem MRI.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBrainCerebral HemorrhageDiagnosisFemaleHistological TechniquesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID27936213
PMCPMC5147972
OpenAlexW2559923924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.