Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27936204›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Serotypes and Antimicrobial Resistance in Salmonella enterica Recovered from Clinical Samples from Cattle and Swine in Minnesota, 2006 to 2015.

Samuel Hong, Albert Rovira, Peter Davies, Christina Ahlstrom, Petra Muellner, Aaron Rendahl, Karen Olsen, Jeff B Bender, Scott Wells, Andres Perez and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Microbiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  3. Genomic evolution ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Molecular Epidemiology ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  6. Sensitivity of dairy calfMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  7. Veterinary sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Characteristics of NontyphoidAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review:Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Evolution of Fluoroquinolone Resistance inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. High-Resolution Genomic Comparisons withinApplied and environmental microbiology · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samuel HongDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, United States of America.
Albert RoviraVeterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, United States of America.
Peter DaviesDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, United States of America.
Christina AhlstromEpi-interactive, Wellington, New Zealand.
Petra MuellnerEpi-interactive, Wellington, New Zealand.
Aaron RendahlSchool of Statistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States of America.
Karen OlsenVeterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, United States of America.
Jeff B BenderDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, United States of America.
Scott WellsDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, United States of America.
Andres PerezDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, United States of America.
Julio AlvarezDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8999-9417
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Salmonellosis remains one of the leading causes of foodborne disease worldwide despite preventive efforts at various stages of the food production chain. The emergence of multi-drug resistant (MDR) non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica represents an additional challenge for public health authorities. Food animals are considered a major reservoir and potential source of foodborne salmonellosis; thus, monitoring of Salmonella strains in livestock may help to detect emergence of new serotypes/MDR phenotypes and to gain a better understanding of Salmonella epidemiology. For this reason, we analyzed trends over a nine-year period in serotypes, and antimicrobial resistance, of Salmonella isolates recovered at the Minnesota Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory (MVDL) from swine (n = 2,537) and cattle (n = 1,028) samples. Prevalence of predominant serotypes changed over time; in swine, S. Typhimurium and S. Derby decreased and S. Agona and S. 4,5,12:i:- increased throughout the study period. In cattle, S. Dublin, S. Montevideo and S. Cerro increased and S. Muenster became less frequent. Median minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values and proportion of antibiotic resistant isolates were higher for those recovered from swine compared with cattle, and were particularly high for certain antibiotic-serotype combinations. The proportion of resistant swine isolates was also higher than observed in the NARMS data, probably due to the different cohort of animals represented in each dataset. Results provide insight into the dynamics of antimicrobial resistant Salmonella in livestock in Minnesota, and can help to monitor emerging trends in antimicrobial resistance.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCattleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMinnesotaSalmonella entericaSwineAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID27936204
PMCPMC5148076
OpenAlexW2560067869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.