Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27936199›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Circulating Microvesicles Are Elevated Acutely following Major Burns Injury and Associated with Clinical Severity.

Kieran P O'Dea, John R Porter, Nikhil Tirlapur, Umar Katbeh, Suveer Singh, Jonathan M Handy, Masao Takata

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kieran P O'DeaSection of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
John R PorterSection of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Nikhil TirlapurSection of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Umar KatbehSection of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Suveer SinghSection of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jonathan M HandySection of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Masao TakataSection of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Imperial College London · GBChelsea and Westminster Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microvesicles are cell-derived signaling particles emerging as important mediators and biomarkers of systemic inflammation, but their production in severe burn injury patients has not been described. In this pilot investigation, we measured circulating microvesicle levels following severe burns, with severe sepsis patients as a comparator group. We hypothesized that levels of circulating vascular cell-derived microvesicles are elevated acutely following burns injury, mirroring clinical severity due to the early onset and prevalence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) in these patients. Blood samples were obtained from patients with moderate to severe thermal injury burns, with severe sepsis, and from healthy volunteers. Circulating microvesicles derived from total leukocytes, granulocytes, monocytes, and endothelial cells were quantified in plasma by flow cytometry. All circulating microvesicle subpopulations were elevated in burns patients on day of admission (day 0) compared to healthy volunteers (leukocyte-microvesicles: 3.5-fold, p = 0.005; granulocyte-microvesicles: 12.8-fold, p<0.0001; monocyte-microvesicles: 20.4-fold, p<0.0001; endothelial- microvesicles: 9.6-fold, p = 0.01), but decreased significantly by day 2. Microvesicle levels were increased with severe sepsis, but less consistently between patients. Leukocyte- and granulocyte-derived microvesicles on day 0 correlated with clinical assessment scores and were higher in burns ICU non-survivors compared to survivors (leukocyte MVs 4.6 fold, p = 0.002; granulocyte MVs 4.8 fold, p = 0.003). Mortality prediction analysis of area under receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.92 (p = 0.01) for total leukocyte microvesicles and 0.85 (p = 0.04) for granulocyte microvesicles. These findings demonstrate, for the first time, acute increases in circulating microvesicles following burns injury in patients and point to their potential role in propagation of sterile SIRS-related pathophysiology.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBurnsCell-Derived MicroparticlesEndothelial CellsFemaleGranulocytesHumansLeukocytesMaleMiddle AgedMonocytesROC CurveSepsisSystemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome

Identifiers

PMID27936199
PMCPMC5148002
OpenAlexW2560849722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.