Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27936046›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

The RAS-Effector Interface: Isoform-Specific Differences in the Effector Binding Regions.

Hossein Nakhaeizadeh, Ehsan Amin, Saeideh Nakhaei-Rad, Radovan Dvorsky, Mohammad Reza Ahmadian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Distinct association of HRAS and KRAS with MnMagnetic resonance letters · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hossein NakhaeizadehInstitute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology II, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Ehsan AminInstitute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology II, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Saeideh Nakhaei-RadInstitute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology II, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Radovan DvorskyInstitute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology II, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Mohammad Reza AhmadianInstitute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology II, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RAS effectors specifically interact with the GTP-bound form of RAS in response to extracellular signals and link them to downstream signaling pathways. The molecular nature of effector interaction by RAS is well-studied but yet still incompletely understood in a comprehensive and systematic way. Here, structure-function relationships in the interaction between different RAS proteins and various effectors were investigated in detail by combining our in vitro data with in silico data. Equilibrium dissociation constants were determined for the binding of HRAS, KRAS, NRAS, RRAS1 and RRAS2 to both the RAS binding (RB) domain of CRAF and PI3Kα, and the RAS association (RA) domain of RASSF5, RALGDS and PLCε, respectively, using fluorescence polarization. An interaction matrix, constructed on the basis of available crystal structures, allowed identification of hotspots as critical determinants for RAS-effector interaction. New insights provided by this study are the dissection of the identified hotspots in five distinct regions (R1 to R5) in spite of high sequence variability not only between, but also within, RB/RA domain-containing effectors proteins. Finally, we propose that intermolecular β-sheet interaction in R1 is a central recognition region while R3 may determine specific contacts of RAS versus RRAS isoforms with effectors.

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAmino Acid SequenceApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsBinding, CompetitiveBinding SitesCarrier ProteinsClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesGTP PhosphohydrolasesHumansKineticsMembrane ProteinsModels, MolecularMonomeric GTP-Binding ProteinsPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesProtein BindingProtein DomainsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsCarrier ProteinsClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesGTP PhosphohydrolasesHRAS protein, humanKRAS protein, humanMembrane ProteinsMonomeric GTP-Binding ProteinsNRAS protein, humanPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPIK3CA protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)ral Guanine Nucleotide Exchange FactorRASSF5 protein, humanRRAS2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID27936046
PMCPMC5147862
OpenAlexW2559900897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.