Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27936034›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Flow Cytometry as a Tool for Quality Control of Fluorescent Conjugates Used in Immunoassays.

Marta de Almeida Santiago, Bruna de Paula Fonseca E Fonseca, Christiane de Fátima da Silva Marques, Edimilson Domingos da Silva, Alvaro Luiz Bertho, Ana Cristina Martins de Almeida Nogueira

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 80% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marta de Almeida SantiagoLaboratory of Diagnostic Technology, Immunobiological Technology Institute, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Bruna de Paula Fonseca E FonsecaLaboratory of Diagnostic Technology, Immunobiological Technology Institute, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Christiane de Fátima da Silva MarquesLaboratory of Diagnostic Technology, Immunobiological Technology Institute, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Edimilson Domingos da SilvaLaboratory of Diagnostic Technology, Immunobiological Technology Institute, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Alvaro Luiz BerthoLaboratory of Immunoparasitology, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Ana Cristina Martins de Almeida NogueiraLaboratory of Clinical Immunology, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of antibodies in immunodiagnostic kits generally implies the conjugation of these proteins with other molecules such as chromophores or fluorochromes. The development of more sensitive quality control procedures than spectrophotometry is essential to assure the use of better fluorescent conjugates since the fluorescent conjugates are critical reagents for a variety of immunodiagnostic kits. In this article, we demonstrate a new flow cytometric protocol to evaluate conjugates by molecules of equivalent soluble fluorochromes (MESF) and by traditional flow cytometric analysis. We have coupled microspheres with anti-IgG-PE and anti-HBSAg-PE conjugates from distinct manufactures and/or different lots and evaluated by flow cytometry. Their fluorescence intensities were followed for a period of 18 months. Our results showed that there was a great difference in the fluorescence intensities between the conjugates studied. The differences were observed between manufactures and lots from both anti-IgG-PE and anti-HBSAg-PE conjugates. Coefficients of variation (CVs) showed that this parameter can be used to determine better coupling conditions, such as homogenous coupling. The MESF analysis, as well as geometric mean evaluation by traditional flow cytometry, showed a decrease in the values for all conjugates during the study and were indispensable tools to validate the results of stability tests. Our data demonstrated the feasibility of the flow cytometric method as a standard quality control of immunoassay kits.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, Anti-IdiotypicAntibodies, ImmobilizedAntibodies, MonoclonalFlow CytometryFluorescein-5-isothiocyanateFluorescenceFluorescent DyesHepatitis B Surface AntigensHumansImmunoassayImmunoconjugatesImmunoglobulin GMicrospheresPhycoerythrinQuality ControlAntibodies, Anti-IdiotypicAntibodies, ImmobilizedAntibodies, Monoclonalanti-IgGFluorescein-5-isothiocyanateFluorescent DyesHepatitis B Surface AntigensImmunoconjugatesImmunoglobulin GPhycoerythrin

Identifiers

PMID27936034
PMCPMC5147945
OpenAlexW2560087904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.