Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27935868›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Analysis of progression-free survival of first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring leu858Arg or exon 19 deletions.

Feng-Che Kuan, Shih-Hong Li, Chih-Liang Wang, Meng-Hung Lin, Ying-Huang Tsai, Cheng-Ta Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Metabolic complete tumor response in a patient withThe Journal of international medical research · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Feng-Che KuanDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi 61363, Taiwan.
Shih-Hong LiDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan.
Chih-Liang WangDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan.
Meng-Hung LinCencer of Excellence for Chang Gung Research Datalink, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi 61363, Taiwan.
Ying-Huang TsaiDivision of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi 61363, Taiwan.
Cheng-Ta YangDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib provide remarkable response rates and progression-free survival compared to platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring epidermal growth factor receptor-activating mutations, and are therefore standard first-line treatment in these patients. However, no study has compared these drugs regarding progression-free survival. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted this retrospective study at a single medical center in Taiwan from February 16, 2011 to October 30, 2015. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate survival, and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models to estimate adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals.

findingsOf the 1006 patients diagnosed with stage IIIb and IV non-small cell lung cancer in the study period, 448 (44.5%) had EGFR-activating mutations and received first-line therapy with gefitinib (n = 304, 67.6%), erlotinib (n = 63, 14.3%), or afatinib (n = 81, 18.1%). The median duration of follow-up for progression-free survival was 12.1 months in the gefitinib arm (Interquartile range [IQR]: 5.5-16.5), 11.2 months in the erlotinib arm (IQR: 4.9-16.7), and 10.3 months in the afatinib arm (IQR: 7.0-14.2). Progression-free survival was significantly longer in the patients who received afatinib or erlotinib compared to those who received gefitinib (log-rank test, p < 0.001), and the median progression-free survival was 11.4 months in the gefitinib group.

interpretationAfatinib and erlotinib provide significant benefits in progression-free survival compared to gefitinib in first-line treatment of patients with non-small-cell lung cancers harboring EGFR-activating mutations. Further clinical trials are warranted to validate these findings.

Indexed as

AgedCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDisease-Free SurvivalErbB ReceptorsExonsFemaleGene DeletionHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedProtein Kinase InhibitorsRetrospective StudiesEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsProtein Kinase InhibitorsafatiniberlotinibgefitinibLeu858ArgThr790Met

Identifiers

PMID27935868
PMCPMC5352060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.