Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27935801›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and planning2017

Maternal and neonatal health impact of obstetrical risk insurance scheme in Mauritania: a quasi experimental before-and-after study.

Aline Philibert, Marion Ravit, Valéry Ridde, Inès Dossa, Emmanuel Bonnet, Florent Bedecarrats, Alexandre Dumont

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and planning, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aline PhilibertInterdisciplinary Research Centre on Well-being, Health, Society and Environment (Cinbiose), University of Quebec in Montreal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Marion RavitIRD, CEPED, UMR 196, Université Paris Descartes-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Paris, France.
Valéry RiddeSchool of Public Health (ESPUM), University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Inès DossaResearch Institute for Development, Université Paris Descartes, COMUE Sorbonnes Paris Cité, UMR MERIT, Paris, France.
Emmanuel BonnetUMR IDEES CNRS 6266, Université de Normandie/IRD RESILIENCE 236, Caen, France.
Florent BedecarratsAgence Française de Développement (AFD), Evaluation Unit, Research and Knowledge Developpement, Paris, France.
Alexandre DumontIRD, CEPED, UMR 196, Université Paris Descartes-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A variety of health financing schemes shaped on pre-payment scheme have been implemented across Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) to address the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). In Mauritania, the Obstetric Risk Insurance package (ORI) focusing on maternal and perinatal health has been progressively implemented at the health district level since 2002. Here, our main objective was to assess the effectiveness of the ORI in increasing facility-based delivery rates, as well as increases in family planning, antenatal and postnatal care, caesarean delivery and neonatal health, from demographic and health survey data between 2002 and 2011. We also examined whether the effects of the ORI varied between strata of the population. The study was based on a quasi-experimental before-and-after design to assess the causal link between availability of ORI and increase in use of maternal health services and neonatal mortality. In combination with geographical information system, difference-in-differences and odd ratio approaches were used to address our objectives. Indicators of access to care for pregnant women and neonatal health and improved in both non-intervention and intervention groups during the study period. There was no global effect of the availability of ORI on facility-based delivery rates, nor on the use of antenatal and postnatal care services, except for qualified antenatal services. However, delivery rates in local health centres with ORI increased more rapidly than in those with no ORI, the contrary was shown for hospitals. Caesarean delivery and family planning decreased with ORI. Although late neonatal mortality rates remained low in the country, a significant decrease was seen in districts without ORI. Except for some strata of the population, ORI has not really met its objective of attracting more pregnant women towards facility-based health care.

Indexed as

Infant MortalityAdolescentAdultFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHealth FacilitiesHealth SurveysHumansInfantInsurance, HealthMaternal Health ServicesMaternal MortalityMauritaniaPregnancyCommunity-based health insuranceinfant mortalitymaternal healthMauritaniaSub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID27935801
PMCPMC5886239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.