Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27935522›Full record

Observational studyThe American journal of clinical nutrition2016

Macro- and micronutrient intakes in picky eaters: a cause for concern?

Caroline M Taylor, Kate Northstone, Susan M Wernimont, Pauline M Emmett

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Do Children Who Were Preschool Picky Eaters Eat Different Foods at School Lunch When Aged 13 Years Than Their Non-Picky Peers?Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Lived Experiences of Fathers in Mealtimes: A Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Literature.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Caroline M TaylorCentre for Child and Adolescent Health, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; caroline.m.taylor@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8347-5092
Kate NorthstoneNational Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West, Bristol, United Kingdom; and.ORCID 0000-0002-0602-1983
Susan M WernimontNestlé Nutrition, King of Prussia, PA.ORCID 0000-0001-7203-1349
Pauline M EmmettCentre for Child and Adolescent Health, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1076-4779

Funding

Medical Research Council G9815508Medical Research Council MC_PC_15018Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPicky eating (PE) is characterized by an unwillingness to eat certain foods and by strong food preferences. PE may result in lower intakes of energy and nutrients, which may compromise health.

objectivesWe quantified nutrient and food group intakes in children identified as picky eaters or nonpicky eaters and compared intakes between groups and with United Kingdom reference nutrient intakes.

designPE was identified in an observational cohort (Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children) from questionnaires administered when children were aged 2, 3, 4.5, and 5.5 y. Dietary intake was assessed at 3.5 and 7.5 y with a 3-d food record. The dietary assessment at 3.5 y compared picky eaters with nonpicky eaters identified at age 3 y, and the assessment at 7.5 y compared longitudinally defined PE groups.

resultsPicky eaters aged 3 y had lower mean carotene, iron, and zinc intakes than nonpicky eaters. There were similar differences between the longitudinally defined PE groups. Iron and zinc intakes were most likely to be below recommended amounts, with free sugar intake much higher than recommended. There were no significant differences in energy intakes between the groups, and intakes were adequate relative to estimated average requirements. Nutrient differences were explained by lower intakes of meat, fish, vegetables, and fruits in picky eaters than in nonpicky eaters. There were higher intakes of sugary foods and drinks in older picky eaters.

conclusionsPE did not result in compromised macronutrient intakes, although intakes of zinc and iron were more likely to be below recommendations for picky eaters than for nonpicky eaters. Emphasis should be placed on allaying parental concerns about picky eaters being prone to inadequate nutrient intakes and on encouraging all parents to extend their child's diet to include more nutrient-rich items, especially fruits and vegetables, and less nutrient-poor sugary foods.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorDietRecommended Dietary AllowancesAnimalsChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesEnergy IntakeFemaleFood PreferencesHumansIron, DietaryLongitudinal StudiesMaleMicronutrientsNutrition AssessmentIron, DietaryMicronutrientsZincALSPACantioxidantsfruitsmacronutrientsmeatmicronutrientspicky eatingvegetables

Identifiers

PMID27935522
PMCPMC5118732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.