Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27935519›Full record

Observational studyThe American journal of clinical nutrition2016

The role of obesity in the relation between total water intake and urine osmolality in US adults, 2009-2012.

Asher Y Rosinger, Hannah G Lawman, Lara J Akinbami, Cynthia L Ogden

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Measuring Human Water Needs.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Asher Y RosingerEpidemic Intelligence Service, Atlanta, GA; yxm9@cdc.gov.
Hannah G LawmanDivision of Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, National Center for Health Statistics, CDC, Hyattsville, MD; and.
Lara J AkinbamiDivision of Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, National Center for Health Statistics, CDC, Hyattsville, MD; and.ORCID 0000-0001-6876-6262
Cynthia L OgdenDivision of Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, National Center for Health Statistics, CDC, Hyattsville, MD; and.
National Center for Health Statistics · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdequate water intake is critical to physiologic and cognitive functioning. Although water requirements increase with body size, it remains unclear whether weight status modifies the relation between water intake and hydration status.

objectiveWe examined how the association between water intake and urine osmolality, which is a hydration biomarker, varied by weight status.

designNHANES cross-sectional data (2009-2012) were analyzed in 9601 nonpregnant adults aged ≥20 y who did not have kidney failure. Weight status was categorized with the use of body mass index on the basis of measured height and weight (underweight or normal weight, overweight, and obesity). Urine osmolality was determined with the use of freezing-point depression osmometry. Hypohydration was classified according to the following age-dependent formula: ≥831 mOsm/kg - [3.4 × (age - 20 y)]. Total water intake was determined with the use of a 24-h dietary recall and was dichotomized as adequate or low on the basis of the Institute of Medicine's adequate intake recommendations for men and women (men: ≥3.7 or <3.7 L; nonlactating women: ≥2.7 or <2.7 L; lactating women: ≥3.8 or <3.8 L for adequate or low intakes, respectively). We tested interactions and conducted linear and log-binomial regressions.

resultsTotal water intake (P = 0.002), urine osmolality (P < 0.001), and hypohydration prevalence (P < 0.001) all increased with higher weight status. Interactions between weight status and water intake status were significant in linear (P = 0.005) and log-binomial (P = 0.015) models, which were then stratified. The prevalence ratio of hypohydration between subjects with adequate water intake and those with low water intake was 0.56 (95% CI: 0.43, 0.73) in adults who were underweight or normal weight, 0.67 (95% CI: 0.57, 0.79) in adults who were overweight, and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.88) in adults who were obese.

conclusionOn a population level, obesity modifies the association between water intake and hydration status.

Indexed as

DrinkingAdultBiomarkersBody Mass IndexBody WeightCross-Sectional StudiesDehydrationFemaleHumansMaleMental RecallMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysObesityOsmolar ConcentrationPrevalenceBiomarkerseffect modificationhydration statusNHANESobesitywater intake

Identifiers

PMID27935519
PMCPMC7392307
OpenAlexW2553547374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.