ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2016
Can T cells be too exhausted to fight back?
Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of ATAC-seq in tumor-specific T cell exhaustion.Cancer gene therapy · 2023Review
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in 10 Years: Contribution of Basic Research and Clinical Application in Cancer Immunotherapy.Immune network · 2022Review
- Adeno-associated viral vector-mediated immune responses: Understanding barriers to gene delivery.Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2020Review
- Mucosal and systemic SIV-specific cytotoxic CD4Scientific reports · 2019Article
- The PD-1/PD-L1 Axis and Virus Infections: A Delicate Balance.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2019Review
- Immunotherapeutics in Multiple Myeloma: How Can Translational Mouse Models Help?Journal of oncology · 2019Review
- The Balance between CD8Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2017Article
- Exhaustion-associated regulatory regions in CD8Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27934723What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.