Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27933737›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2017

Testing the influence of surfactant-based wound dressings on proteinase activity.

Sunyoung Jeong, Gregory S Schultz, Daniel J Gibson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sunyoung JeongThe Institute for Wound Research at the University of Florida, Department of OB/GYN, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Gregory S SchultzThe Institute for Wound Research at the University of Florida, Department of OB/GYN, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Daniel J GibsonThe Institute for Wound Research at the University of Florida, Department of OB/GYN, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
University of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteinases are enzymes that can digest other proteins. In chronic wounds, a sub-class of these enzymes with the ability to degrade the extracellular matrix (matrix metalloproteinases, MMPs) have been found to both inhibit healing and to be able to aid in enzymatically debriding a wound. Enzymatic debridement using the enzymes present in a wound is generally called autolytic debridement. Clinicians seeking to employ autolytic debridement typically use occlusive materials such as medical honey, alginate dressings and other occlusive dressings. A relatively new class of gel dressings comprised of surfactants are now available for clinical use. A variety of surfactants are used in the study of MMP biochemistry. Surfactants can deactivate MMPs or can enhance their activity, depending on the surfactant. In order to begin to understand how the MMPs found in chronic wounds would respond to these new dressings, we tested a serial dilution series of two of the currently available surfactant-based dressings to determine their effects on four separate MMPs. The dose-response versus MMP activity of bacterial collagenase, host-derived MMP-8 and MMPs-2 and -9 was assessed using a simple mix-and-read fluorescent peptide activity assay. The enzyme's native activity in the absence of the gel was used to compare against the surfactant-treated samples. We found that the surfactant affected the proteinase activity differently for each enzyme. The activity of the bacterial collagenase was increased at low concentrations but slightly inhibited as the concentrations increased. The host MMP-8 collagenase responded similarly in that it was inhibited at higher concentrations. Interestingly, both MMP gelatinases presented with substantially increased activities, with MMP-2 increased to 200% of native activity, while MMP-9 presented with an increase of 300% activity over the same concentration range. MMPs appear to respond to a surfactant-based gel dressing differentially, with the MMP most commonly elevated in chronic wounds having the highest boost to activity. In wounds with elevated MMPs, our data suggest that the use of these surfactant-based dressings would be expected to enhance the activity of MMPs 2 and 9 gelatinases while simultaneously inhibiting MMP-8 collagenase. Hypothetically, this imbalanced effect would support a protection of the native dermal collagen and removal of denatured materials. However, the demonstration of these anticipated consequences is still being investigated.

Indexed as

Occlusive DressingsCollagenasesDebridementHumansMatrix MetalloproteinasesSurface-Active AgentsWound HealingCollagenasesMatrix MetalloproteinasesSurface-Active AgentsAutolytic debridementMMPsProteinasesSurfactant gel dressing

Identifiers

PMID27933737
PMCPMC7950041
OpenAlexW2560741505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.