Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27933731›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2017

Independent risk factors for the development of skin erosion due to incontinence (incontinence-associated dermatitis category 2) in nursing home residents: results from a multivariate binary regression analysis.

Nele Van Damme, Karen Van den Bussche, Dorien De Meyer, Ann Van Hecke, Sofie Verhaeghe, Dimitri Beeckman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Incontinence-associated dermatitis: a position paper].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nele Van DammeUniversity Centre for Nursing and Midwifery - Department of Public Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3882-6222
Karen Van den BusscheUniversity Centre for Nursing and Midwifery - Department of Public Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Dorien De MeyerUniversity Centre for Nursing and Midwifery - Department of Public Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Ann Van HeckeUniversity Centre for Nursing and Midwifery - Department of Public Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Sofie VerhaegheUniversity Centre for Nursing and Midwifery - Department of Public Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Dimitri BeeckmanUniversity Centre for Nursing and Midwifery - Department of Public Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Ghent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify characteristics independently associated with a higher risk of developing skin damage because of incontinence [incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD) category 2] in nursing home residents. As part of a larger randomised controlled trial, IAD incidence was monitored for 1 month in a sample of 381 incontinent residents using a validated IAD Severity Categorisation Tool. Data on demographical, physical, functional and psychological characteristics were collected. The overall IAD incidence (category 1-2) was 30·0%, and 6% of the participants developed skin damage (IAD category 2). Residents who developed IAD category 2 were less mobile [odds ratio (OR) 2·72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1·06-6·94], had more friction and shear issues (OR 2·54; 95% CI 1·02-6·33) and had more erythema due to incontinence (OR 3·02; 95% CI 1·04-8·73) before IAD category 2 occurrence. Care providers should give full attention to risk factors to both detect residents at risk for IAD development and to start prevention in time.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overDermatitisFecal IncontinenceFemaleHomes for the AgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNursing HomesRegression AnalysisRisk FactorsSkin CareUrinary IncontinenceElderlyIncontinence-associated dermatitisNursing homePreventionRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID27933731
PMCPMC7949981
OpenAlexW2563626671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.