Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27933569›Full record

ReviewAdvances in therapy2017

Decision-Making in Clinical Practice: Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients with Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation and a Single Additional Stroke Risk Factor.

Tatjana S Potpara, Nikolaos Dagres, Nebojša Mujović, Dragan Vasić, Milika Ašanin, Milan Nedeljkovic, Francisco Marin, Laurent Fauchier, Carina Blomstrom-Lundqvist, Gregory Y H Lip

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: comparison of recent international guidelines.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

Tatjana S PotparaSchool of Medicine, Belgrade University, Belgrade, Serbia. tatjana.potpara@mfub.bg.ac.rs.
Nikolaos DagresDepartment of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Nebojša MujovićSchool of Medicine, Belgrade University, Belgrade, Serbia.
Dragan VasićVascular Surgery Clinic, Clinical Centre, Belgrade, Serbia.
Milika AšaninSchool of Medicine, Belgrade University, Belgrade, Serbia.
Milan NedeljkovicSchool of Medicine, Belgrade University, Belgrade, Serbia.
Francisco MarinDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, IMIB-Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain.
Laurent FauchierService de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau et Faculte de Medecine, Universite Francois Rabelais, Tours, France.
Carina Blomstrom-LundqvistDepartment of Cardiology, Institution of Medical Science, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Gregory Y H LipSchool of Medicine, Belgrade University, Belgrade, Serbia.
Centar za Promociju Nauke · RSUniversity of Belgrade · RSAalborg University · DKHospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca · ESLeipzig Heart Institute · DEUniversité de Tours · FRUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 1 in 3-4 patients presenting with an ischemic stroke will also have atrial fibrillation (AF), and AF-related strokes can be effectively prevented using oral anticoagulant therapy (OAC), either with well-controlled vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). In addition, OAC use (both VKAs and NOACs) is associated with a 26% reduction in all-cause mortality (VKAs) or an additional 10% mortality reduction with NOACs relative to VKAs. The decision to use OAC in individual AF patient is based on the estimated balance of the benefit from ischemic stroke reduction against the risk of major OAC-related bleeding [essentially intracranial hemorrhage (ICH)]. Better appreciation of the importance of VKAs' anticoagulation quality [a target time in therapeutic range (TTR) of ≥70%] and the availability of NOACs (which offer better safety compared to VKAs) have decreased the estimated threshold for OAC treatment in AF patients towards lower stroke risk levels. Still, contemporary registry-based data show that OAC is often underused in AF patients at increased risk of stroke. The uncertainty whether to use OAC may be particularly pronounced in AF patients with a single additional stroke risk factor, who are often (mis)perceived as having a "borderline" or insufficient stroke risk to trigger the use of OAC. However, observational data from real-world AF cohorts show that the annual stroke rates in such patients are higher than in patients with no additional stroke risk factors, and OAC use has been associated with reduction in stroke, systemic embolism, or death in comparison to no therapy or aspirin, with no increase in the risk of bleeding relative to aspirin. In this review article, we summarize the basic principles of stroke risk stratification in AF patients and discuss contemporary real-world evidence on OAC use and outcomes of OAC treatment in AF patients with a single additional stroke risk factor in various real-world AF cohorts.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationStrokeAdministration, OralAnticoagulantsClinical Decision-MakingHumansRisk AdjustmentAnticoagulantsAtrial fibrillationNon-valvular atrial fibrillationNon-vitamin K antagonistOral anticoagulantsStroke preventionStroke risk assessmentStroke risk factorStroke risk scoresVitamin K antagonist

Identifiers

PMID27933569
PMCPMC5331111
OpenAlexW2560497014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.