Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27933485›Full record

ReviewNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2017

Fluid-Based Biomarkers for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Lucas T Vu, Robert Bowser

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Peripheral and cerebrospinal fluid inflammatory markers in sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis an exploratory cross-sectional association study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. A phase I study to evaluate the dosimetry and safety of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Metabolomics: a new frontier in neurodegenerative disease biomarker discovery.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Antibody-Based PET Imaging of Misfolded Superoxide Dismutase 1 in an Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Mouse Model.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lucas T VuDepartment of Neurology, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, 350 West Thomas Road, Phoenix, AZ, 85013, USA.
Robert BowserDepartment of Neurology, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, 350 West Thomas Road, Phoenix, AZ, 85013, USA. robert.bowser@dignityhealth.org.
Barrow Neurological Institute · US

Funding

Peptide and Protein Biomarkers for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)R01NS061867 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BOWSER, ROBERT P · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
Multi-Center Validation of Biomarkers for Motor Neuron DiseaseRC1NS068179 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BOWSER, ROBERT P, CUDKOWICZ, MERIT E · 2009 to 2010
$977k
Peptide and Protein Biomarkers for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)R56NS061867 · NINDS · ST. JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER · PI BOWSER, ROBERT P · 2014 to 2014
$687k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS061867NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS061867NINDS NIH HHS RC1 NS068179
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a highly heterogeneous disease with no effective treatment. Drug development has been hampered by the lack of biomarkers that aid in early diagnosis, demonstrate target engagement, monitor disease progression, and can serve as surrogate endpoints to assess the efficacy of treatments. Fluid-based biomarkers may potentially address these issues. An ideal biomarker should exhibit high specificity and sensitivity for distinguishing ALS from control (appropriate disease mimics and other neurologic diseases) populations and monitor disease progression within individual patients. Significant progress has been made using cerebrospinal fluid, serum, and plasma in the search for ALS biomarkers, with urine and saliva biomarkers still in earlier stages of development. A few of these biomarker candidates have demonstrated use in patient stratification, predicting disease course (fast vs slow progression) and severity, or have been used in preclinical and clinical applications. However, while ALS biomarker discovery has seen tremendous advancements in the last decade, validating biomarkers and moving them towards the clinic remains more elusive. In this review, we highlight biomarkers that are moving towards clinical utility and the challenges that remain in order to implement biomarkers at all stages of the ALS drug development process.

Indexed as

BiomarkersDisease ProgressionAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisHumansBiomarkersALSBiomarkersClinicalDiagnosticPreclinicalPrognostic

Identifiers

PMID27933485
PMCPMC5233638
OpenAlexW2560731570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.