Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27933461›Full record

ArticleAIDS and behavior2017

Factors Associated with HIV Testing Among Participants from Substance Use Disorder Treatment Programs in the US: A Machine Learning Approach.

Yue Pan, Hongmei Liu, Lisa R Metsch, Daniel J Feaster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS and behavior, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Determinants and prediction ofFrontiers in public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yue PanDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120 N.W. 14th ST, Miami, FL, 33136, USA. panyue@med.miami.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9586-0975
Hongmei LiuDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120 N.W. 14th ST, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Lisa R MetschDepartment of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th ST, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Daniel J FeasterDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120 N.W. 14th ST, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.

Funding

FLORIDA NODE OF THE DRUG ABUSE CLINICAL TRIALS NETWORKU10DA013720 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI METSCH, LISA R, SZAPOCZNIK, JOSE · 2000 to 2015
$56.9M
The Florida Node Alliance of the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials NetworkUG1DA013720 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Daniel J Feaster, Viviana Elizabeth Horigian · 2015 to 2026
$50.6M
The Statistics, Data Science, and Data Management (SDM) CoreP30MH043520 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI MILTON L WAINBERG · 2003 to 2026
$48.2M
Clinical Trials Network, Ohio Valley Node U10DA013732U10DA013732 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI WINHUSEN, T JOHN · 2000 to 2015
$45.0M
Southern Consortium Node of the Clinical Trials NetworkU10DA013727 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T. · 2000 to 2015
$34.4M
Western States Node of the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials NetworkU10DA015815 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MCCARTY, DENNIS, SORENSEN, JAMES L · 2002 to 2015
$25.2M
CLINICAL TRIALS NETWORK MID-ATLANTIC COLLABORATIVE GROUPU10DA013034 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SCHWARTZ, ROBERT P, STITZER, MAXINE L · 1999 to 2015
$25.2M
Clinical Trials Network: Southwest NodeU10DA015833 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI MCCRADY, BARBARA S · 2002 to 2014
$19.9M
OREGON NODE - NATIONAL CLINICAL TRIALS NETWORKU10DA013036 · NIDA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI MCCARTY, DENNIS · 1999 to 2010
$18.5M
CLINICAL TRIALS NETWORK: NEW ENGLAND NODEU10DA013038 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CARROLL, KATHLEEN M. · 1999 to 2010
$17.3M
CLINICAL TRIAL RESEARCH PROJECT COREU10DA020036 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DALEY, DENNIS C · 2005 to 2015
$14.1M
Identifying Subgroups with Different Responses to HIV Risk Reduction CounselingR21DA038641 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI FEASTER, DANIEL J · 2014 to 2015
$419k
NIDA NIH HHS HHSN271200522071CNIDA NIH HHS R21 DA038641NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA013034NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA013036NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA013038NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA013720NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA013727NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA013732NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA015815NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA015833NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA020036NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA013720NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH043520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HIV testing is the foundation for consolidated HIV treatment and prevention. In this study, we aim to discover the most relevant variables for predicting HIV testing uptake among substance users in substance use disorder treatment programs by applying random forest (RF), a robust multivariate statistical learning method. We also provide a descriptive introduction to this method for those who are unfamiliar with it. We used data from the National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network HIV testing and counseling study (CTN-0032). A total of 1281 HIV-negative or status unknown participants from 12 US community-based substance use disorder treatment programs were included and were randomized into three HIV testing and counseling treatment groups. The a priori primary outcome was self-reported receipt of HIV test results. Classification accuracy of RF was compared to logistic regression, a standard statistical approach for binary outcomes. Variable importance measures for the RF model were used to select the most relevant variables. RF based models produced much higher classification accuracy than those based on logistic regression. Treatment group is the most important predictor among all covariates, with a variable importance index of 12.9%. RF variable importance revealed that several types of condomless sex behaviors, condom use self-efficacy and attitudes towards condom use, and level of depression are the most important predictors of receipt of HIV testing results. There is a non-linear negative relationship between count of condomless sex acts and the receipt of HIV testing. In conclusion, RF seems promising in discovering important factors related to HIV testing uptake among large numbers of predictors and should be encouraged in future HIV prevention and treatment research and intervention program evaluations.

Indexed as

CounselingMachine LearningSexual BehaviorAttitude to HealthComorbidityCondomsDrug UsersFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMass ScreeningSafe SexSelf EfficacySubstance-Related DisordersHIV testingMultivariate analysisRandom forestSexual risk behaviorsSubstance useSupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID27933461
PMCPMC5583728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.