Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27933427›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2017

Minimal impact of response shift for SF-12 mental and physical health status in homeless and vulnerably housed individuals: an item-level multi-group analysis.

Anne M Gadermann, Richard Sawatzky, Anita Palepu, Anita M Hubley, Bruno D Zumbo, Tim Aubry, Susan Farrell, Stephen W Hwang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A systematic review of the quality of reporting of simulation studies about methods for the analysis of complex longitudinal patient-reported outcomes data.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anne M GadermannCentre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada. anne.gadermann@ubc.ca.
Richard SawatzkyCentre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada.
Anita PalepuCentre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada.
Anita M HubleyMeasurement, Evaluation, and Research Methodology Program, Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology and Special Education, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Bruno D ZumboMeasurement, Evaluation, and Research Methodology Program, Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology and Special Education, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Tim AubrySchool of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Susan FarrellSchool of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Stephen W HwangCentre for Research on Inner City Health, Keenan Research Centre in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

CIHR MOP-86765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to examine whether homeless or vulnerably housed individuals experienced response shift over a 12-month time period in their self-reported physical and mental health status.

methodsData were obtained from the Health and Housing in Transition study, a longitudinal multi-site cohort study in Canada (N = 1190 at baseline). Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis (MG-CFA) and methods for response shift detection at the item level, based on the approach by Oort, were used to test for reconceptualization, reprioritization, and recalibration response shift on the SF-12 in four groups of individuals who were homeless (n = 170), housed (n = 437), or who reported a change in their housing status [from homeless to housed (n = 285) or housed to homeless (n = 73)] over a 12-month time period. Mean and variance adjusted weighted-least squares estimation was used to accommodate the ordinal and binary distributions of the SF-12 items.

resultsUsing MG-CFA, a strict invariance model showed that the measurement model was equivalent for the four groups at baseline. Although we found small but statistically significant response shift for several measurement model parameters, the impact on the predicted average mental and physical health scores within each of the groups was small.

conclusionsResponse shift does not appear to be a significant concern when using the SF-12 to obtain change scores over a 12-month period in this population.

Indexed as

Health StatusHousingIll-Housed PersonsMental HealthAdultCanadaCohort StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSelf ReportVulnerable PopulationsHealthHomeless personsMental healthResponse shiftSF-12Vulnerable populations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.