ArticleInternational orthopaedics2017
Dual mobility cups in revision total hip arthroplasty.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk factors and modes of failure in the modern dual mobility implant. A systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021Pooled it
- Risk of revision and dislocation in single, dual mobility and large femoral head total hip arthroplasty: systematic review and network meta-analysis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2018Pooled it
- Dual mobility cups reduce dislocation in isolated cup revision.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Observational
- Similar risks of complications and reoperation rates in proximal femur megaprostheses for oncological and non-oncological indications.International orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Unstable Total Hip Arthroplasty: Should It Be Revised Using Dual Mobility Implants? A Retrospective Analysis from the R.I.P.O. Registry.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Analysis of an explanted dual mobility cup after 21 years, parabolic wear pattern: A case report.SICOT-J · 2023Article
- Major acetabular defects: outcomes of first revision total hip arthroplasty using Kerboull cross-plate with allograft and cemented dual mobility cup at a maximum follow-up of fourteen years.International orthopaedics · 2022Article
- Dual mobility for total hip arthroplasty revision surgery: A systematic review and metanalysis.SICOT-J · 2021Article
- Comparison of Constrained Acetabular Components and Dual Mobility Cups in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Literature Review.Hip & pelvis · 2020Review
- Dual mobility constructs in revision total hip arthroplasty: survivorship analysis in recurrent dislocation versus other indications at three to twelve-year follow-up.International orthopaedics · 2020Article
- A comparative study about the incidence of dislocation and peri-prosthetic fracture between dual mobility versus standard cups after primary total hip arthroplasty.International orthopaedics · 2019Article
- Long-term survivorship of a monoblock long cementless stem in revision total hip arthroplasty.International orthopaedics · 2019Article
- Revision total hip arthroplasty with a Kerboull plate: comparative outcomes using standard versus dual mobility cups.International orthopaedics · 2019Article
- Cause of irreducible dislocation of a re-revision THR.BMJ case reports · 2018Article
- Comparison of dual mobility cup and other surgical construts used for three hundred and sixty two first time hip revisions due to recurrent dislocations: five year results from Lithuanian arthroplasty register.International orthopaedics · 2018Article
- Salvage of a monoblock metal-on-metal cup using a dual mobility liner: a two-year MRI follow-up study.International orthopaedics · 2018Article
- Dual-mobility cup: a new French revolution.International orthopaedics · 2017Article
- Dislocated and Dissociated Dual-Mobility Components Are Easily Missed and More Than Half Fail Closed Reduction: Six Tips to Aid Management.JB & JS open accessArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe purpose of our study was to evaluate the dislocation and aseptic loosening rates of a dual mobility construct in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA).
methodsThree hundred thirty-four revision THAs performed between 2006 and 2011, using a dual mobility cup, were included in this retrospective study. The indications for revision were aseptic loosening (70%), infection (21%) and recurrent instability (9%). The minimum follow-up was five years (mean 7 ± 2 years, maximum 10 years).
resultsAt the latest follow-up, 11 episodes of dislocation occurred, seven of which were recurrent (1.3% for aseptic loosening, 2.8% for infection and 3.4% for recurrent dislocation). Ten cases of aseptic loosening occurred; in seven of them, a cemented cup into a reinforcement ring had been used (OR = 14, p = 0.0001).
conclusionThis study provided evidence of the advantages of dual mobility cups in all revision THA indications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.