Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27933352›Full record

ReviewHNO2017

Intracochlear drug delivery in combination with cochlear implants : Current aspects.

S K Plontke, G Götze, T Rahne, A Liebau

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in HNO, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Angular Insertion Depth for Cochlear Implantation: A Comparative Analysis on Precision of CT, MRI, and x-Ray.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Advances in Evaluation of Electrode Insertion Trauma Induced Residual Hearing loss in Cochlear Implant Recipients and its significance- A Narrative Review.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Endoscopic diving technique for hearing preservation in managing labyrinth-invading cholesteatomas.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S K PlontkeDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, University Hospital, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany. stefan.plontke@uk-halle.de.
G GötzeDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, University Hospital, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
T RahneDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, University Hospital, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
A LiebauDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, University Hospital, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Local drug application to the inner ear offers a number of advantages over systemic delivery. Local drug therapy currently encompasses extracochlear administration (i. e., through intratympanic injection), intracochlear administration (particularly for gene and stem cell therapy), as well as various combinations with auditory neurosensory prostheses, either evaluated in preclinical or clinical studies, or off-label. To improve rehabilitation with cochlear implants (CI), one focus is the development of drug-releasing electrode carriers, e. g., for delivery of glucocorticosteroids, antiapoptotic substances, or neurotrophins to the inner ear. The performance of cochlear implants may thus be improved by protecting neuronal structures from insertion trauma, reducing fibrosis in the inner ear, and by stimulating growth of neuronal structures in the direction of the electrodes. Controlled drug release after extracochlear or intracochlear application in conjunction with a CI can also be achieved by use of a biocompatible, resorbable controlled-release drug-delivery system. Two case reports for intracochlear controlled release drug delivery in combination with cochlear implants are presented. In order to treat progressive reduction in speech discrimination and increased impedance, two cochlear implant patients successfully underwent intracochlear placement of a biocompatible, resorbable drug-delivery system for controlled release of dexamethasone. The drug levels reached in inner ear fluids after different types of local drug application strategies can be calculated using a computer model. The intracochlear drug concentrations calculated in this way were compared for different dexamethasone application strategies.

Indexed as

CochleaCochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsCombined Modality TherapyEvidence-Based MedicineHumansLabyrinth DiseasesNeuroprotective AgentsPostoperative ComplicationsPremedicationTreatment OutcomeNeuroprotective AgentsCochleaCochlear implantDrug deliveryImpedanceInner ear

Identifiers

PMID27933352
PMCPMC5281641
OpenAlexW2565941038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.