Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27933293›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2016

Differences in the Mechanical Properties of the Developing Cerebral Cortical Proliferative Zone between Mice and Ferrets at both the Tissue and Single-Cell Levels.

Arata Nagasaka, Tomoyasu Shinoda, Takumi Kawaue, Makoto Suzuki, Kazuaki Nagayama, Takeo Matsumoto, Naoto Ueno, Ayano Kawaguchi, Takaki Miyata

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Multiscale Mechanobiology in Brain Physiology and Diseases.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Ex Vivo Modeling of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Homing to the Fetal Liver.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Arata NagasakaDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University Nagoya, Japan.
Tomoyasu ShinodaDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University Nagoya, Japan.
Takumi KawaueDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University Nagoya, Japan.
Makoto SuzukiDivision for Morphogenesis, Department of Developmental Biology, National Institute for Basic Biology Okazaki, Japan.
Kazuaki NagayamaMicro-Nano Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Intelligent Systems Engineering, Ibaraki University Hitachi, Japan.
Takeo MatsumotoBiomechanics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology Nagoya, Japan.
Naoto UenoDivision for Morphogenesis, Department of Developmental Biology, National Institute for Basic Biology Okazaki, Japan.
Ayano KawaguchiDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University Nagoya, Japan.
Takaki MiyataDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University Nagoya, Japan.
Nagoya University · JPNational Institute for Basic Biology · JPIbaraki University · JPNagoya Institute of Technology · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell-producing events in developing tissues are mechanically dynamic throughout the cell cycle. In many epithelial systems, cells are apicobasally tall, with nuclei and somata that adopt different apicobasal positions because nuclei and somata move in a cell cycle-dependent manner. This movement is apical during G2 phase and basal during G1 phase, whereas mitosis occurs at the apical surface. These movements are collectively referred to as interkinetic nuclear migration, and such epithelia are called "pseudostratified." The embryonic mammalian cerebral cortical neuroepithelium is a good model for highly pseudostratified epithelia, and we previously found differences between mice and ferrets in both horizontal cellular density (greater in ferrets) and nuclear/somal movements (slower during G2 and faster during G1 in ferrets). These differences suggest that neuroepithelial cells alter their nucleokinetic behavior in response to physical factors that they encounter, which may form the basis for evolutionary transitions toward more abundant brain-cell production from mice to ferrets and primates. To address how mouse and ferret neuroepithelia may differ physically in a quantitative manner, we used atomic force microscopy to determine that the vertical stiffness of their apical surface is greater in ferrets (Young's modulus = 1700 Pa) than in mice (1400 Pa). We systematically analyzed factors underlying the apical-surface stiffness through experiments to pharmacologically inhibit actomyosin or microtubules and to examine recoiling behaviors of the apical surface upon laser ablation and also through electron microscopy to observe adherens junction. We found that although both actomyosin and microtubules are partly responsible for the apical-surface stiffness, the mouse<ferret relationship in the apical-surface stiffness was maintained even in the presence of inhibitors. We also found that the stiffness of single, dissociated neuroepithelial cells is actually greater in mice (720 Pa) than in ferrets (450 Pa). Adherens junction was ultrastructurally comparable between mice and ferrets. These results show that the horizontally denser packing of neuroepithelial cell processes is a major contributor to the increased tissue-level apical stiffness in ferrets, and suggest that tissue-level mechanical properties may be achieved by balancing cellular densification and the physical properties of single cells.

Indexed as

actomyosinapical surfaceatomic force microscopycell densityelasticityinterkinetic nuclear migrationneural progenitor cellneuroepithelium

Identifiers

PMID27933293
PMCPMC5122735
OpenAlexW2552271364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.