Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27933280›Full record

ReviewClinical and translational imaging2016

Bone imaging in prostate cancer: the evolving roles of nuclear medicine and radiology.

Gary J R Cook, Gurdip Azad, Anwar R Padhani

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and translational imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Unexplained Cardiac Uptake onAsia Oceania journal of nuclear medicine & biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. IncreasedSkeletal radiology · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Quantitative [EJNMMI physics · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Comparison ofEuropean journal of hybrid imaging · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gary J R CookDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, Department of Cancer Imaging, Clinical PET Centre, St Thomas' Hospital, Kings College London, London, SE1 7EH UK.
Gurdip AzadDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, Department of Cancer Imaging, Clinical PET Centre, St Thomas' Hospital, Kings College London, London, SE1 7EH UK.
Anwar R PadhaniPaul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Rickmansworth Road, Northwood, Middlesex HA6 2RN UK.
King's College London · GBMount Vernon Cancer Centre · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16463Prostate Cancer UK PA12-04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bone scan continues to be recommended for both the staging and therapy response assessment of skeletal metastases from prostate cancer. However, it is widely recognised that bone scans have limited sensitivity for disease detection and is both insensitive and non-specific for determining treatment response, at an early enough time point to be clinically useful. We, therefore, review the evolving roles of nuclear medicine and radiology for this application. We have reviewed the published literature reporting recent developments in imaging bone metastases in prostate cancer, and provide a balanced synopsis of the state of the art. The development of single-photon emission computed tomography combined with computed tomography has improved detection sensitivity and specificity but has not yet been shown to lead to improvements in monitoring therapy. A number of bone-specific and tumour-specific tracers for positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) are now available for advanced prostate cancer that show promise in both clinical settings. At the same time, the development of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) that incorporates diffusion-weighted imaging also offers significant improvements for detection and therapy response assessment. There are emerging data showing comparative SPECT/CT, PET/CT, and WB-MRI test performance for disease detection, but no compelling data on the usefulness of these technologies in response assessment have yet emerged.

Indexed as

Bone metastasesBone scanPositron emission tomographyProstate cancerSingle photon emission computed tomographyWhole body magnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID27933280
PMCPMC5118401
OpenAlexW2475623934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.