Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27933209›Full record

ArticleRMD open2016

Prevalence and incidence of gout in southern Sweden from the socioeconomic perspective.

Meliha C Kapetanovic, Mohaned Hameed, Aleksandra Turkiewicz, Tuhina Neogi, Tore Saxne, Lennart Jacobsson, Martin Englund

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RMD open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Meliha C KapetanovicDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund, Section for Rheumatology , Lund University, Lund and Skåne University Hospital, Section for Rheumatology in Lund and Malmö , Lund , Sweden.
Mohaned HameedDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund, Section for Rheumatology , Lund University, Lund and Skåne University Hospital, Section for Rheumatology in Lund and Malmö , Lund , Sweden.
Aleksandra TurkiewiczFaculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Orthopedics, Clinical Epidemiology Unit , Lund University , Lund , Sweden.
Tuhina NeogiClinical Epidemiology Research and Training Unit , Boston University School of Medicine , Boston, Massachusetts , USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9515-1711
Tore SaxneDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund, Section for Rheumatology , Lund University, Lund and Skåne University Hospital, Section for Rheumatology in Lund and Malmö , Lund , Sweden.
Lennart JacobssonDepartment of Rheumatology & Inflammation Research , Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg , Gothenburg , Sweden.
Martin EnglundFaculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Orthopedics, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Clinical Epidemiology Research and Training Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Lund University · SEBoston University · USUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo estimate the prevalence and cumulative incidence of gout in southern Sweden with respect to socioeconomic status.

methodsAmong residents of Skåne region in the year 2013 (total population 1.3 million), adult persons (age 18 years +) who between 1998 and 2013 received a diagnosis of gout (International Classification of Disease 10th Edition (ICD-10) code M10) by any physician were identified using the Skåne Healthcare Register. We calculated the point prevalence by end of 2013 and annual cumulative incidence in 2013 standardised to the whole Skåne population according to sex, individual information on occupation (white collar/blue collar), income (low/middle/high) and level of education (primary school/high school/university).

resultsThe crude 2013 point prevalence of gout and 2013 cumulative incidence (95% CI) were 1.69% (1.66% to 1.71%) and 24 cases per 10 000 persons (23-25), respectively. Compared to women, men had higher point prevalence (2.44% (2.40% to 2.49%) vs 0.96% (0.93% to 0.98%)) and higher annual cumulative incidence (33 cases per 10 000 (32-35)) versus 15 (14-16)). These figures increased with higher age but decreased with higher level of education, being the lowest in individuals with a university degree. Persons with middle income had highest point prevalence and cumulative incidence of gout, while those with white collar occupations had the lowest.

conclusionsGout is the most common inflammatory arthritis in southern Sweden with a prevalence of ∼1.7% in the adult population. There is a socioeconomic gradient with more gout present in the lower level of education and with more manual labour.

Indexed as

EpidemiologyGoutOutcomes research

Identifiers

PMID27933209
PMCPMC5133407
OpenAlexW2548926470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.