ArticleBMJ open diabetes research & care2016
Quality of care in rural youth with type 1 diabetes: a cross-sectional pilot assessment.
Article in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04098978 (Before-after Comparison of Pharmacist Drug Therapy Management in Pediatric Hypertension), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Before-after Comparison of Pharmacist Drug Therapy Management in Pediatric Hypertension
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rural Caregiver Perceptions on the Content and Receipt of a Diabetes Management Telehealth Occupation-Based Coaching Intervention.OTJR : occupation, participation and health · 2025Article
- Meeting the Needs of Emerging Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Living in a Rural Area With Mobile Health Interventions: Focus Group Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Access to Specialty Care for Commercially Insured Youths With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Article
- Urban-rural disparities in interfacility transfers for children during COVID-19.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2023Article
- Physician-Pharmacist Collaborative Drug Therapy Management in Pediatric Hypertension.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2023Article
- Full-Time or Working Caregiver? A Health Economics Perspective on the Supply of Care for Type 1 Diabetes Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Glycemic outcomes among rural patients in the type 1 diabetes T1D Exchange registry, January 2016-March 2018: a cross-sectional cohort study.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2022Article
- Hybrid Closed-Loop Systems for the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes: A Collaborative, Expert Group Position Statement for Clinical Use in Central and Eastern Europe.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2021Article
- Magnitude and predictors of hospital admission, readmission, and length of stay among patients with type 2 diabetes at public hospitals of Eastern Ethiopia: a retrospective cohort study.BMC endocrine disorders · 2021Article
- Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of diabetes mellitus in rural Rwanda: time to contextualize the interventions? A cross-sectional study.BMC endocrine disorders · 2020Article
- Influence of Socio-Economic and Cultural Factors on Type 1 Diabetes Management: Report from a Tertiary Care Multidisciplinary Diabetes Management Center in India.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2020Article
- Implementation of Electronic Medical Record Template Improves Screening for Complications in Children with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.Pediatric health, medicine and therapeutics · 2020Article
- Breaking Socioeconomic Barriers in Diabetes Technologies: Outcomes of a Pilot Insulin Pump Programme for the Underprivileged in Rural India.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolismArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundType 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) presents a significant health burden for patients and families. The quality of care (QOC) among those living in rural communities is thought to be subpar compared with those in urban communities; however, little data exist to reflect this, especially in pediatric diabetes.
objectiveThe purpose of this pilot study was to investigate diabetes QOC among families living in rural versus urban areas. 6 QOC markers were used to compare youth with T1DM: appointment adherence, patient-provider communication, diabetes education during clinic visit, congruency with diabetes standards of care, diabetes self-management behaviors, and diabetes-related hospitalizations. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsParticipants were rural or urban adult caregivers of youth ages 2-18 with ≥10-month history of T1DM receiving treatment at Seattle Children's Hospital, USA. Participants were from rural areas of central Washington, or urban areas of western Washington. Caregivers completed a 26-item survey pertaining to the 6 QOC markers. The 6 QOC markers were compared across 61 participants (34 rural, 27 urban), to determine how diabetes care quality and experiences differed. Data were collected over 12 months. Groups were compared using t-tests and χ
resultsCompared with urban families, rural families reported significantly lower income and a 4-fold greater usage of public insurance. Among the QOC measures, rural participants were significantly worse off in the appointment adherence, patient-provider communication, and hospitalizations categories. Congruence with diabetes standards of care (foot care only) was also significantly poorer in rural participants.
conclusionsThe burden of travel in conjunction with the lack of resources in this rural population of families with T1DM youth is cause for concern and warrants further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.