ArticleBMJ open diabetes research & care2016
Validation of the German Diabetes Risk Score among the general adult population: findings from the German Health Interview and Examination Surveys.
Article in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protocol of a cluster randomized trial to investigate the impact of a type 2 diabetes risk prediction model on change in physical activity in primary care.BMC endocrine disorders · 2018Trial
- Article
- Type 2 diabetes among people with selected citizenships in Germany: risk, healthcare, complications.Journal of health monitoring · 2024Article
- Intersectional analysis of social disparities in type 2 diabetes risk among adults in Germany: results from a nationwide population-based survey.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Article
- Nutrient scoring for the DEGS1-FFQ - from food intake to nutrient intake.BMC nutrition · 2023Article
- German Diabetes Risk Score for the Determination of the Individual Type 2 Diabetes Risk—10-Year Prediction and External Validations.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2022Article
- Article
- Dihydroceramide- and ceramide-profiling provides insights into human cardiometabolic disease etiology.Nature communications · 2022Observational
- Diabetes mellitus and comorbidities - A cross-sectional study with control group based on nationwide ambulatory claims data.Journal of health monitoring · 2021Article
- A Panel of 6 Biomarkers Significantly Improves the Prediction of Type 2 Diabetes in the MONICA/KORA Study Population.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2021Article
- Low health literacy is associated with higher risk of type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study in Germany.BMC public health · 2021Article
- Estimating the impact of tax policy interventions on the projected number and prevalence of adults with type 2 diabetes in Germany between 2020 and 2040.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2021Article
- Deciphering the Plasma Proteome of Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetes · 2020Article
- Health App Use and Its Correlates Among Individuals With and Without Type 2 Diabetes: Nationwide Population-Based Survey.JMIR diabetes · 2020Article
- Social inequality and diabetes mellitus - developments over time among the adult population in Germany.Journal of health monitoring · 2019Article
- Protein markers and risk of type 2 diabetes and prediabetes: a targeted proteomics approach in the KORA F4/FF4 study.European journal of epidemiology · 2019Article
- Driving Type 2 Diabetes Risk Scores into Clinical Practice: Performance Analysis in Hospital Settings.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Article
- Assessing the performance of genome-wide association studies for predicting disease risk.PloS one · 2019Article
- Perceived diabetes risk and related determinants in individuals with high actual diabetes risk: results from a nationwide population-based survey.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the German Diabetes Risk Score (GDRS) among the general adult German population for prediction of incident type 2 diabetes and detection of prevalent undiagnosed diabetes.
methodsThe longitudinal sample for prediction of incident diagnosed type 2 diabetes included 3625 persons who participated both in the examination survey in 1997-1999 and the examination survey in 2008-2011. Incident diagnosed type 2 diabetes was defined as first-time physician diagnosis or antidiabetic medication during 5 years of follow-up excluding potential incident type 1 and gestational diabetes. The cross-sectional sample for detection of prevalent undiagnosed diabetes included 6048 participants without diagnosed diabetes of the examination survey in 2008-2011. Prevalent undiagnosed diabetes was defined as glycated haemoglobin ≥6.5% (48 mmol/mol). We assessed discrimination as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC (95% CI)) and calibration through calibration plots.
resultsIn longitudinal analyses, 82 subjects with incident diagnosed type 2 diabetes were identified after 5 years of follow-up. For prediction of incident diagnosed diabetes, the GDRS yielded an ROC-AUC of 0.87 (0.83 to 0.90). Calibration plots indicated excellent prediction for low diabetes risk and overestimation for intermediate and high diabetes risk. When considering the entire follow-up period of 11.9 years (ROC-AUC: 0.84 (0.82 to 0.86)) and including incident undiagnosed diabetes (ROC-AUC: 0.81 (0.78 to 0.84)), discrimination decreased somewhat. A previously simplified paper version of the GDRS yielded a similar predictive ability (ROC-AUC: 0.86 (0.82 to 0.89)). In cross-sectional analyses, 128 subjects with undiagnosed diabetes were identified. For detection of prevalent undiagnosed diabetes, the ROC-AUC was 0.84 (0.81 to 0.86). Again, the simplified version yielded a similar result (ROC-AUC: 0.83 (0.80 to 0.86)).
conclusionsThe GDRS might be applied for public health monitoring of diabetes risk in the German adult population. Future research needs to evaluate whether the GDRS is useful to improve diabetes risk awareness and prevention among the general population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.