Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27932995›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2016

Genome Sizes of Nine Insect Species Determined by Flow Cytometry and

Kang He, Kejian Lin, Guirong Wang, Fei Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genome size estimation and evolution trends in Acari.Experimental & applied acarology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. A vetiver-specific terpene synthaseProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. A genome survey ofZooKeys · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Genome size evaluations in cockroaches: new entries.European journal of histochemistry : EJH · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Estimation of Genome Size in the Endemic SpeciesPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kang HeDepartment of Entomology, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University Nanjing, China.
Kejian LinState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Beijing, China.
Guirong WangState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Beijing, China.
Fei LiDepartment of Entomology, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural UniversityNanjing, China; Ministry of Agriculture, Key Lab of Agricultural Entomology and Institute of Insect Sciences, Zhejiang UniversityHangzhou, China.
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNInstitute of Plant Protection · CNNanjing Agricultural University · CNZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The flow cytometry method was used to estimate the genome sizes of nine agriculturally important insects, including two coleopterans, five Hemipterans, and two hymenopterans. Among which, the coleopteran

Indexed as

flow cytometrygenome sizeinsect invasivenessk-mer analysissex difference

Identifiers

PMID27932995
PMCPMC5121235
OpenAlexW2557035672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.