Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27932970›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2016

Bayesian Inference of Synaptic Quantal Parameters from Correlated Vesicle Release.

Alex D Bird, Mark J Wall, Magnus J E Richardson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Modeling the Short-Term Dynamics ofThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  12. Identifiability of a Binomial Synapse.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  13. Model-Based Inference of Synaptic Transmission.Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alex D BirdTheoretical Neuroscience Group, Warwick Systems Biology Centre, University of WarwickCoventry, UK; Ernst Strüngmann Institute for Neuroscience, Max Planck SocietyFrankfurt, Germany; Frankfurt Institute for Advanced StudiesFrankfurt, Germany.
Mark J WallSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick Coventry, UK.
Magnus J E RichardsonTheoretical Neuroscience Group, Warwick Systems Biology Centre, University of WarwickCoventry, UK; Warwick Mathematics Institute, University of WarwickCoventry, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synaptic transmission is both history-dependent and stochastic, resulting in varying responses to presentations of the same presynaptic stimulus. This complicates attempts to infer synaptic parameters and has led to the proposal of a number of different strategies for their quantification. Recently Bayesian approaches have been applied to make more efficient use of the data collected in paired intracellular recordings. Methods have been developed that either provide a complete model of the distribution of amplitudes for isolated responses or approximate the amplitude distributions of a train of post-synaptic potentials, with correct short-term synaptic dynamics but neglecting correlations. In both cases the methods provided significantly improved inference of model parameters as compared to existing mean-variance fitting approaches. However, for synapses with high release probability, low vesicle number or relatively low restock rate and for data in which only one or few repeats of the same pattern are available, correlations between serial events can allow for the extraction of significantly more information from experiment: a more complete Bayesian approach would take this into account also. This has not been possible previously because of the technical difficulty in calculating the likelihood of amplitudes seen in correlated post-synaptic potential trains; however, recent theoretical advances have now rendered the likelihood calculation tractable for a broad class of synaptic dynamics models. Here we present a compact mathematical form for the likelihood in terms of a matrix product and demonstrate how marginals of the posterior provide information on covariance of parameter distributions. The associated computer code for Bayesian parameter inference for a variety of models of synaptic dynamics is provided in the Supplementary Material allowing for quantal and dynamical parameters to be readily inferred from experimental data sets.

Indexed as

BayesiancorrelationEPSPplasticityquantalstochasticsynapse

Identifiers

PMID27932970
PMCPMC5122579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.