Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27932945›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2016

Monoaminergic and Histaminergic Strategies and Treatments in Brain Diseases.

Giuseppe Di Giovanni, Dubravka Svob Strac, Montse Sole, Mercedes Unzeta, Keith F Tipton, Dorotea Mück-Šeler, Irene Bolea, Laura Della Corte, Matea Nikolac Perkovic, Nela Pivac and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Neuromelanin-sensitive MRI for mechanistic research and biomarker development in psychiatry.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
  6. Exploring the KeLife · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Copy Number Variations in Neuropsychiatric Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Journal of traditional and complementary medicine · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Personalizing the Care and Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease: An Overview.Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. A simple mechanistic terminology of psychoactive drugs: a proposal.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2020
    Review
  20. International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 8 countries.

Giuseppe Di GiovanniDepartment of Physiology and Biochemistry, University of Malta Msida, Malta.
Dubravka Svob StracDivision of Molecular Medicine, Rudjer Boskovic Institute Zagreb, Croatia.
Montse SoleDepartament de Bioquímica i Biologia Molecular, Facultat de Medicina, Institut de Neurociències, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona, Spain.
Mercedes UnzetaDepartament de Bioquímica i Biologia Molecular, Facultat de Medicina, Institut de Neurociències, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona, Spain.
Keith F TiptonSchool of Biochemistry and Immunology, Trinity College Dublin Dublin, Ireland.
Dorotea Mück-ŠelerDivision of Molecular Medicine, Rudjer Boskovic Institute Zagreb, Croatia.
Irene BoleaDepartament de Bioquímica i Biologia Molecular, Facultat de Medicina, Institut de Neurociències, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona, Spain.
Laura Della CorteDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Florence Florence, Italy.
Matea Nikolac PerkovicDivision of Molecular Medicine, Rudjer Boskovic Institute Zagreb, Croatia.
Nela PivacDivision of Molecular Medicine, Rudjer Boskovic Institute Zagreb, Croatia.
Ilse J SmoldersDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Drug Analysis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussels, Belgium.
Anna StasiakDepartment of Hormone Biochemistry, Medical University of Lodz Lodz, Poland.
Wieslawa A FogelDepartment of Hormone Biochemistry, Medical University of Lodz Lodz, Poland.
Philippe De DeurwaerdèreCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique (Unité Mixte de Recherche 5293), Institut of Neurodegenerative Diseases Bordeaux Cedex, France.
Rudjer Boskovic Institute · HRUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESMedical University of Lodz · PLInstitut des Maladies Neurodégénératives · FRTrinity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Malta · MTVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The monoaminergic systems are the target of several drugs for the treatment of mood, motor and cognitive disorders as well as neurological conditions. In most cases, advances have occurred through serendipity, except for Parkinson's disease where the pathophysiology led almost immediately to the introduction of dopamine restoring agents. Extensive neuropharmacological studies first showed that the primary target of antipsychotics, antidepressants, and anxiolytic drugs were specific components of the monoaminergic systems. Later, some dramatic side effects associated with older medicines were shown to disappear with new chemical compounds targeting the origin of the therapeutic benefit more specifically. The increased knowledge regarding the function and interaction of the monoaminergic systems in the brain resulting from

Indexed as

antidepressantantiparkinsonian treatmentsantipsychoticdrug addictionmonoamine oxidase inhibitormulti-target pharmacologyneurodegenerative diseasesstroke

Identifiers

PMID27932945
PMCPMC5121249
OpenAlexW2552692034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.