Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27932506›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2017

Synthetic MRI in the Detection of Multiple Sclerosis Plaques.

A Hagiwara, M Hori, K Yokoyama, M Y Takemura, C Andica, T Tabata, K Kamagata, M Suzuki, K K Kumamaru, M Nakazawa and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Optimization of the Data Pattern and Analysis Algorithm for the T2-based Water Suppression Diffusion MRImaging (T2wsup-dMRI) Technique.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

A HagiwaraFrom the Departments of Radiology (A.H., M.H., M.Y.T., C.A., T.T., K.K., M.S., K.K.K., M.N., N.T., H.K., N.H., S.A.) ahagiwara-tky@umin.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-5277-3249
M HoriFrom the Departments of Radiology (A.H., M.H., M.Y.T., C.A., T.T., K.K., M.S., K.K.K., M.N., N.T., H.K., N.H., S.A.).ORCID 0000-0002-1791-8032
K YokoyamaNeurology (K.Y.), Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0950-1093
M Y TakemuraFrom the Departments of Radiology (A.H., M.H., M.Y.T., C.A., T.T., K.K., M.S., K.K.K., M.N., N.T., H.K., N.H., S.A.).ORCID 0000-0002-8187-0926
C AndicaFrom the Departments of Radiology (A.H., M.H., M.Y.T., C.A., T.T., K.K., M.S., K.K.K., M.N., N.T., H.K., N.H., S.A.).ORCID 0000-0002-9339-6950
T TabataFrom the Departments of Radiology (A.H., M.H., M.Y.T., C.A., T.T., K.K., M.S., K.K.K., M.N., N.T., H.K., N.H., S.A.).ORCID 0000-0002-9102-0255
K KamagataFrom the Departments of Radiology (A.H., M.H., M.Y.T., C.A., T.T., K.K., M.S., K.K.K., M.N., N.T., H.K., N.H., S.A.).ORCID 0000-0001-5028-218X
M SuzukiFrom the Departments of Radiology (A.H., M.H., M.Y.T., C.A., T.T., K.K., M.S., K.K.K., M.N., N.T., H.K., N.H., S.A.).ORCID 0000-0002-2625-1161
K K KumamaruFrom the Departments of Radiology (A.H., M.H., M.Y.T., C.A., T.T., K.K., M.S., K.K.K., M.N., N.T., H.K., N.H., S.A.).ORCID 0000-0001-5924-3283
M NakazawaFrom the Departments of Radiology (A.H., M.H., M.Y.T., C.A., T.T., K.K., M.S., K.K.K., M.N., N.T., H.K., N.H., S.A.).ORCID 0000-0002-6309-2403
N TakanoFrom the Departments of Radiology (A.H., M.H., M.Y.T., C.A., T.T., K.K., M.S., K.K.K., M.N., N.T., H.K., N.H., S.A.).ORCID 0000-0003-1506-6849
H KawasakiFrom the Departments of Radiology (A.H., M.H., M.Y.T., C.A., T.T., K.K., M.S., K.K.K., M.N., N.T., H.K., N.H., S.A.).ORCID 0000-0002-1942-9363
N HamasakiFrom the Departments of Radiology (A.H., M.H., M.Y.T., C.A., T.T., K.K., M.S., K.K.K., M.N., N.T., H.K., N.H., S.A.).ORCID 0000-0001-8360-4034
A KunimatsuDepartment of Radiology (A.H., A.K.), Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7141-2585
S AokiFrom the Departments of Radiology (A.H., M.H., M.Y.T., C.A., T.T., K.K., M.S., K.K.K., M.N., N.T., H.K., N.H., S.A.).ORCID 0000-0003-2821-0651
Norwegian Womens Public Health Association · NOJuntendo University · JPThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeSynthetic MR imaging enables the creation of various contrast-weighted images including double inversion recovery and phase-sensitive inversion recovery from a single MR imaging quantification scan. Here, we assessed whether synthetic MR imaging is suitable for detecting MS plaques. MATERIALS AND

methodsQuantitative and conventional MR imaging data on 12 patients with MS were retrospectively analyzed. Synthetic T2-weighted, FLAIR, double inversion recovery, and phase-sensitive inversion recovery images were produced after quantification of T1 and T2 values and proton density. Double inversion recovery images were optimized for each patient by adjusting the TI. The number of visible plaques was determined by a radiologist for a set of these 4 types of synthetic MR images and a set of conventional T1-weighted inversion recovery, T2-weighted, and FLAIR images. Conventional 3D double inversion recovery and other available images were used as the criterion standard. The total acquisition time of synthetic MR imaging was 7 minutes 12 seconds and that of conventional MR imaging was 6 minutes 29 seconds The lesion-to-WM contrast and lesion-to-WM contrast-to-noise ratio were calculated and compared between synthetic and conventional double inversion recovery images.

resultsThe total plaques detected by synthetic and conventional MR images were 157 and 139, respectively (

conclusionsSynthetic MR imaging enabled detection of more MS plaques than conventional MR imaging in a comparable acquisition time. The contrast for MS plaques on synthetic double inversion recovery images was better than on conventional double inversion recovery images.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDemyelinating DiseasesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID27932506
PMCPMC7963841
OpenAlexW2559964732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.