Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27931556›Full record

Trial reportIndian heart journal

Non-physician health workers for improving adherence to medications and healthy lifestyle following acute coronary syndrome: 24-month follow-up study.

Krishna Kumar Sharma, Rajeev Gupta, Mukul Mathur, Vishnu Natani, Sailesh Lodha, Sanjeeb Roy, Denis Xavier

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Indian heart journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. An Intervention Study for Impact Assessment of Health Education by Empowered Community Health Workers in Improving Treatment and Diet Adherence in Hypertension.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Krishna Kumar SharmaDepartment of Pharmacology, SMS Medical College, Jaipur 302004, India; Department of Medicine, Fortis Escorts Hospital, Jaipur 302017, India.
Rajeev GuptaDepartment of Medicine, Fortis Escorts Hospital, Jaipur 302017, India; Department of Medicine, Eternal Heart Care Centre and Research Institute, Jaipur 302020, India. Electronic address: rajeevgg@gmail.com.
Mukul MathurDepartment of Pharmacology, SMS Medical College, Jaipur 302004, India.
Vishnu NataniDepartment of Medicine, Fortis Escorts Hospital, Jaipur 302017, India.
Sailesh LodhaDepartment of Endocrinology, Fortis Escorts Hospital, Jaipur 302017, India.
Sanjeeb RoyDepartment of Cardiology, Fortis Escorts Hospital, Jaipur 302017, India.
Denis XavierDepartment of Pharmacology, St John's Medical College, Bangalore 560068, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate usefulness of non-physician health workers (NPHW) to improve adherence to medications and lifestyles following acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

methodsWe randomized 100 patients at hospital discharge following ACS to NPHW intervention (n=50) or standard care (n=50) in an open label study. NPHW was trained for interventions to improve adherence to medicines - antiplatelets, β-blockers, renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers and statins and healthy lifestyles. Intervention lasted 12 months with passive follow-up for another 12. Both groups were assessed for adherence using a standardized questionnaire.

resultsST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was in 49 and non-STEMI in 51, mean age was 59.0±11 years. 57% STEMI were thrombolyzed. On admission majority were physically inactive (71%), consumed unhealthy diets (high fat 77%, high salt 58%, low fiber 57%) and 21% were smokers/tobacco users. Coronary revascularization was performed in 90% (percutaneous intervention 79%, bypass surgery 11%). Drugs at discharge were antiplatelets 100%, β-blockers 71%, RAS blockers 71% and statins 99%. Intervention and control groups had similar characteristics. At 12 and 24 months, respectively, in intervention vs control groups adherence (>80%) was: anti platelets 92.0% vs 77.1% and 83.3% vs 40.9%, β blockers 97.2% vs 90.3% and 84.8% vs 45.0%), RAS blockers 95.1% vs 82.3% and 89.5% vs 46.1%, and statins 94.0% vs 70.8% and 87.5% vs 29.5%; smoking rates were 0.0% vs 12.5% and 4.2% vs 20.5%, regular physical activity 96.0% vs 50.0%, and 37.5% vs 34.1%, and healthy diet score 5.0 vs 3.0, and 4.0 vs 2.0 (p<0.01 for all). Intervention vs standard group at 12 months had significantly lower mean systolic BP, heart rate, body mass index, waist:hip ratio, total cholesterol, triglyceride, and LDL cholesterol (p<0.01).

conclusionsNPHW-led educational intervention for 12 months improved adherence to evidence based medicines and healthy lifestyles. Efficacy continued for 24 months with attrition.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersDrug MonitoringHealthy LifestyleAcute Coronary SyndromeFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSecondary PreventionTime FactorsAcute coronary eventCommunity health workerDeveloping countriesSecondary prevention

Identifiers

PMID27931556
PMCPMC5143810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.