Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27931316›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2016

Exhaust Air Dust Monitoring is Superior to Soiled Bedding Sentinels for the Detection of Pasteurella pneumotropica in Individually Ventilated Cage Systems.

Manuel Miller, Brbel Ritter, Julia Zorn, Markus Brielmeier

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Why Is the Current Monitoring of Rodentibacter spp. Exclusively by Molecular Methods Insufficient?Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Improved Detection of Murine Pathogens Using Sentinel-Free Media Compared to Live Animal Sampling.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025
    Article
  6. Detection and Remediation of Pneumocystis murina Infections by Environmental Health Monitoring.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025
    Article
  7. Rodent Pathogen Detection via Testing of Soiled Nesting Material.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pathogen Prevalence Estimates and Diagnostic Methodology Trends in Laboratory Mice and Rats from 2003 to 2020.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2023
    Article
  12. A Cross-sectional Survey on Rodent Environmental Health Monitoring Practices: Benchmarking, Associations, and Barriers.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Using Sterile Flocked Swabs as an Alternative Method for Rodent Health Monitoring.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Health Monitoring of Laboratory Rodent Colonies-Talking about (R)evolution.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. PCR Testing of Media Placed in Soiled Bedding as a Method for Mouse Colony Health Surveillance.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2021
    Article
  19. Evaluation of In-cage Filter Paper as a Replacement for Sentinel Mice in the Detection of Murine Pathogens.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2021
    Article
  20. Cost Comparison of Rodent Soiled Bedding Sentinel and Exhaust Air Dust Health-Monitoring Programs.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Manuel MillerResearch Unit for Comparative Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum Mnchen, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany;, Email: manuel.miller@helmholtz-muenchen.de.
Brbel RitterResearch Unit for Comparative Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum Mnchen, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.
Julia ZornResearch Unit for Comparative Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum Mnchen, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.
Markus BrielmeierResearch Unit for Comparative Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum Mnchen, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.
Helmholtz Zentrum München · DECenter for Environmental Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliable detection of unwanted organisms is essential for meaningful health monitoring in experimental animal facilities. Currently, most rodents are housed in IVC systems, which prevent the aerogenic transmission of pathogens between cages. Typically soiled-bedding sentinels (SBS) exposed to soiled bedding collected from a population of animals within an IVC rack are tested as representatives, but infectious agents often go undetected due to inefficient transmission. Pasteurellaceae are among the most prevalent bacterial pathogens isolated from experimental mice, and the failure of SBS to detect these bacteria is well established. In this study, we investigated whether analysis of exhaust air dust (EAD) samples by using a sensitive and specific real-time PCR assay is superior to conventional SBS monitoring for the detection of Pasteurella pneumotropica (Pp) infections. In a rack with a known prevalence of Pp-positive mice, weekly EAD sampling was compared with the classic SBS method over 3 mo. In 6 rounds of testing, with a prevalence of 5 infected mice in each of 7 cages in a rack of 63 cages, EAD PCR detected Pp at every weekly time point; SBS failed to detect Pp in all cases. The minimal prevalence of Pp-infected mice required to obtain a reliable positive result by EAD PCR testing was determined to be 1 in 63 cages. Reliable detection of Pp was achieved after only 1 wk of exposure. Analysis of EAD samples by real-time PCR assay provides a sensitive, simple, and reliable approach for Pp identification in laboratory mice.

Indexed as

Housing, AnimalAir FiltersAnimalsBedding and LinensDustFemaleMicePasteurella InfectionsPasteurella pneumotropicaReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRodent DiseasesSensitivity and SpecificityDust

Identifiers

PMID27931316
PMCPMC5113879
OpenAlexW2586946588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.