Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27931046›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2017

Perivascular PDGFR-β is an independent marker for prognosis in renal cell carcinoma.

Magnus Frödin, Artur Mezheyeuski, Sara Corvigno, Ulrika Harmenberg, Per Sandström, Lars Egevad, Martin Johansson, Arne Östman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. PDGFR-βAging · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. HOOK1 Inhibits the Progression of Renal Cell Carcinoma via TGF-β and TNFSF13B/VEGF-A Axis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Magnus FrödinDepartment of Pathology-Oncology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Artur MezheyeuskiDepartment of Pathology-Oncology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sara CorvignoDepartment of Pathology-Oncology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ulrika HarmenbergDepartment of Pathology-Oncology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Per SandströmDepartment of Pathology-Oncology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lars EgevadDepartment of Pathology-Oncology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Martin JohanssonDepartment of Translational Medicine, Clinical Pathology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Arne ÖstmanDepartment of Pathology-Oncology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SELund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRenal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a highly vascularised tumour, where anti-angiogenic treatment with multi-tyrosine-kinase-inhibitor, is used for first-line treatment of metastatic disease. Variations in vascular characteristics are likely to contribute to variations in intrinsic aggressiveness of the disease. Emerging studies are identifying perivascular status, including perivascular PDGFR-β, as a determinant of prognosis in other tumour types.

methodsThis work explored the impact on prognosis of vascular characteristics in RCC through analyses of a population-based collection of tumours from surgery-alone-treated patients. The quantitative data from a panel of vascular metrics were obtained through computerised image analysis of sections double-stained for expression of the endothelial cell marker CD34 together with perivascular markers α-SMA or PDGFR-β.

resultsPerivascular expression of PDGFR-β and α-SMA were positively correlated to each other, and negatively correlated to vessel density. High expression of PDGFR-β and α-SMA as well as low vessel density was significantly associated with short survival in uni- and multivariate analyses. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that the prognostic impact of the perivascular markers was particularly prominent in the T4-subgroup. A novel metric, related to PDGFR-β perivascular heterogeneity, was also associated with prognosis in uni-and multi-variate analyses. This novel metric also acted as a prognosis marker in ovarian cancer.

conclusionsThe study demonstrates previously unrecognised associations between RCC survival and the absolute levels, and variability, of perivascular PDGFR-β. This marker should be further explored in other RCC cohorts. Findings also suggest mechanistic analyses and studies on the relationship between perivascular status and efficacy of multi-tyrosine-kinase-inhibitors.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBlood VesselsCarcinoma, Renal CellCohort StudiesFemaleHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeovascularization, PathologicPrognosisReceptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor betaBiomarkers, TumorReceptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor beta

Identifiers

PMID27931046
PMCPMC5243993
OpenAlexW2560218567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.