Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27930581›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2016

Associations between interventions for urolithiasis and urinary tract cancer among patients in Taiwan: The effect of early intervention.

Chien-Liang Lin, Wen-Tsung Huang, Wen-Chou Fan, Yin-Hsun Feng, Chia-Ho Lin, Chian-Shiung Lin, Chih-Cheng Lu, Tse-Chou Cheng, Chao-Jung Tsao, Sheng-Hsiang Lin

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Application of warning biopsies in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.Translational andrology and urology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Chien-Liang LinDivision of Hematology and Oncology Division of Urology, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Liouying Campus Min-Hwei Junior College of Health Care Management Department of Nursing Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Biostatistics Consulting Center, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan.
Wen-Tsung Huang
Wen-Chou Fan
Yin-Hsun Feng
Chia-Ho Lin
Chian-Shiung Lin
Chih-Cheng Lu
Tse-Chou Cheng
Chao-Jung Tsao
Sheng-Hsiang Lin
HTC (Taiwan) · TWChi Mei Medical Center · TWNational Cheng Kung University Hospital · TWPalmetto Hematology Oncology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate cancer risk in patients with a history of urolithiasis and to determine whether intervention for calculi attenuated the risk of subsequent urinary tract cancer (UTC).Using data from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan, we performed a nationwide cohort study enrolling participants (n = 42,732) aged > 30 years who were diagnosed with urinary tract calculi between 2000 and 2009. Age- and gender-matched insured individuals (n = 213,660) found in the health service records over the same period were recruited as the control group. The Cox proportional hazards model and competing risks regression model were used to examine the relationship between urolithiasis and UTC, as well as whether early intervention for urolithiasis decreased the subsequent cancer risk relative to late intervention.Participants with a previous diagnosis of urolithiasis (n = 695) had a 1.82-fold (95% CI: 1.66-1.99, P < 0.001) increased risk of developing UTC. Furthermore, the risk of UTC associated with urolithiasis was higher in women (adjusted HR: 2.43, 95% CI: 1.94-3.05) than in men (adjusted HR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.55-1.90). When stratified by cancer site, the adjusted HR for bladder, renal pelvis/ureter, renal, and prostate cancers were 1.94 (95% CI: 1.62-2.33), 2.94 (95% CI: 2.24-3.87), 2.94 (95% CI: 2.29-3.77), and 1.45 (95% CI: 1.27-1.65), respectively. Patients who received interventions for urolithiasis within 3 months of detection had a decreased risk of subsequent UTC (adjusted HR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.40-0.71, P < 0.001).The present study demonstrated that urolithiasis increased the risk of subsequent UTC, especially upper UTC. Hence, it is recommended that physicians administer the appropriate interventions as early as possible upon diagnosis of urolithiasis.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge DistributionCohort StudiesDatabases, FactualFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceLithotripsyLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPrecancerous ConditionsProportional Hazards ModelsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID27930581
PMCPMC5266053
OpenAlexW2560079534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.