Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27930309›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Sox2+ progenitors in sharks link taste development with the evolution of regenerative teeth from denticles.

Kyle J Martin, Liam J Rasch, Rory L Cooper, Brian D Metscher, Zerina Johanson, Gareth J Fraser

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Tooth regeneration in animals. A systematic review.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Teeth outside the jaw: Evolution and development of the toothed head clasper in chimaeras.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Tooth Removal in the Leopard Gecko and theFrontiers in physiology · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kyle J MartinDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom.
Liam J RaschDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom.
Rory L CooperDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom.
Brian D MetscherDepartment of Theoretical Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna A-1090, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6514-4406
Zerina JohansonDepartment of Earth Sciences, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom.
Gareth J FraserDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom; G.Fraser@sheffield.ac.uk.
University of Sheffield · GBNatural History Museum · GBUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M012522/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Teeth and denticles belong to a specialized class of mineralizing epithelial appendages called odontodes. Although homology of oral teeth in jawed vertebrates is well supported, the evolutionary origin of teeth and their relationship with other odontode types is less clear. We compared the cellular and molecular mechanisms directing development of teeth and skin denticles in sharks, where both odontode types are retained. We show that teeth and denticles are deeply homologous developmental modules with equivalent underlying odontode gene regulatory networks (GRNs). Notably, the expression of the epithelial progenitor and stem cell marker sex-determining region Y-related box 2 (sox2) was tooth-specific and this correlates with notable differences in odontode regenerative ability. Whereas shark teeth retain the ancestral gnathostome character of continuous successional regeneration, new denticles arise only asynchronously with growth or after wounding. Sox2+ putative stem cells associated with the shark dental lamina (DL) emerge from a field of epithelial progenitors shared with anteriormost taste buds, before establishing within slow-cycling cell niches at the (i) superficial taste/tooth junction (T/TJ), and (ii) deep successional lamina (SL) where tooth regeneration initiates. Furthermore, during regeneration, cells from the superficial T/TJ migrate into the SL and contribute to new teeth, demonstrating persistent contribution of taste-associated progenitors to tooth regeneration in vivo. This data suggests a trajectory for tooth evolution involving cooption of the odontode GRN from nonregenerating denticles by sox2+ progenitors native to the oral taste epithelium, facilitating the evolution of a novel regenerative module of odontodes in the mouth of early jawed vertebrates: the teeth.

Indexed as

RegenerationSharksAnimalsbeta CateninBiological EvolutionCell LineageCell MovementCell ProliferationChickensGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationMicePhylogenyRanidaeSkinSOXB1 Transcription Factorsbeta CateninSOXB1 Transcription Factorschondrichthyesevolutionary noveltyodontogenesisregenerationstem cells

Identifiers

PMID27930309
PMCPMC5187730
OpenAlexW2560720736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.