Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27930304›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Emergent oscillations assist obstacle negotiation during ant cooperative transport.

Aviram Gelblum, Itai Pinkoviezky, Ehud Fonio, Nir S Gov, Ofer Feinerman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Comparing cooperative geometric puzzle solving in ants versus humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Scale-Free Dynamics in Animal Groups and Brain Networks.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aviram GelblumDepartment of Physics of Complex Systems, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel.
Itai PinkoviezkyDepartment of Chemical Physics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel.
Ehud FonioDepartment of Physics of Complex Systems, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel.
Nir S GovDepartment of Chemical Physics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel ofer.feinerman@weizmann.ac.il nir.gov@weizmann.ac.il.
Ofer FeinermanDepartment of Physics of Complex Systems, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel; ofer.feinerman@weizmann.ac.il nir.gov@weizmann.ac.il.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collective motion by animal groups is affected by internal interactions, external constraints, and the influx of information. A quantitative understanding of how these different factors give rise to different modes of collective motion is, at present, lacking. Here, we study how ants that cooperatively transport a large food item react to an obstacle blocking their path. Combining experiments with a statistical physics model of mechanically coupled active agents, we show that the constraint induces a deterministic collective oscillatory mode that facilitates obstacle circumvention. We provide direct experimental evidence, backed by theory, that this motion is an emergent group effect that does not require any behavioral changes at the individual level. We trace these relaxation oscillations to the interplay between two forces; informed ants pull the load toward the nest whereas uninformed ants contribute to the motion's persistence along the tangential direction. The model's predictions that oscillations appear above a critical system size, that the group can spontaneously transition into its ordered phase, and that the system can exhibit complete rotations are all verified experimentally. We expect that similar oscillatory modes emerge in collective motion scenarios where the structure of the environment imposes conflicts between individually held information and the group's tendency for cohesiveness.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorMotionNesting BehaviorAnimalsAntsBehavior, AnimalModels, BiologicalModels, StatisticalMovementProbabilityanimal groupscollective motionemergent behaviorsocial insectsstatistical physics

Identifiers

PMID27930304
PMCPMC5187715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.