Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27929743›Full record

ArticlemAbs

Knowledge, behaviors and practices of community and hospital pharmacists towards biosimilar medicines: Results of a French web-based survey.

Morgane Beck, Bruno Michel, Marie-Christine Rybarczyk-Vigouret, Dominique Levêque, Christelle Sordet, Jean Sibilia, Michel Velten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mAbs. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pharmacists' Perspectives of Biosimilars: A Systematic Review.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Understanding US Physician and Pharmacist Attitudes Toward Biosimilar Products: A Qualitative Study.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. European Stakeholder Learnings Regarding Biosimilars: Part I-Improving Biosimilar Understanding and Adoption.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Morgane Becka OMEDIT Alsace, Agence Régionale de Santé Alsace Champagne-Ardenne Lorraine , Strasbourg , France.
Bruno Michela OMEDIT Alsace, Agence Régionale de Santé Alsace Champagne-Ardenne Lorraine , Strasbourg , France.
Marie-Christine Rybarczyk-Vigoureta OMEDIT Alsace, Agence Régionale de Santé Alsace Champagne-Ardenne Lorraine , Strasbourg , France.
Dominique Levêqueb Service de Pharmacie-Stérilisation, C.H.R.U. Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg , Strasbourg , France.
Christelle Sordetd Service de Rhumatologie, C.H.R.U. Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg , Strasbourg , France.
Jean Sibiliad Service de Rhumatologie, C.H.R.U. Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg , Strasbourg , France.
Michel Veltene Laboratoire d'épidémiologie et de santé publique - EA3430, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg , Strasbourg , France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study's aims were: 1) to extract a comprehensive overview of the knowledge, experience and opinions of both community pharmacists and hospital pharmacists regarding biosimilar medicines in France; and 2) to identify the perceived problems and solutions to promoting their prescription. A 2015 web-based survey was conducted by the Observatoire des Médicaments, des Dispositifs Médicaux et de l'Innovation Thérapeutique of Alsace. A total of 802 pharmacists responded to the survey. Many (536, 66.8%, [95% confidence interval (CI) 63.6-70.1]) indicated that they were not familiar with biosimilars. Half of community pharmacists (95% CI 42.7-57.3) stated that they were not at all informed about biosimilar drugs, compared with 15.7% (95% CI 12.9-18.6) of hospital pharmacists. Almost all respondents (781, 97.4%, [95% CI 96.3-98.5]) had at least one pending question on biosimilars. Most of the questions were related to the manufacturing process, safety, substitution rules and the international non-proprietary name prescription. At the time of the study, 467 pharmacists (58.2%, [95% CI 54.8-61.6]) had already validated a prescription for a biosimilar drug, mainly for filgrastim. These latter were more comfortable in explaining the benefit of biosimilar medicines to the patient. Pharmacists were rather favorable to biosimilar drugs, and about 9 of 10 quoted healthcare cost savings as incentives to their prescription. However, many did not agree with allowing biosimilar substitution. "Patients' wishes to be treated with the originator" and "indication extrapolation" were the two main constraints identified. The survey highlighted the need to provide French pharmacists with accurate and comprehensive information regarding biosimilar medicines.

Indexed as

Biosimilar PharmaceuticalsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePharmacistsAdultAgedFemaleFranceHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsBiosimilar medicinecommunity pharmacistexperiencehospital pharmacistknowledgeopinionsurvey

Identifiers

PMID27929743
PMCPMC5297517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.