Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27929721›Full record

Trial reportJournal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics2017

A Randomized Multicenter Study Comparing 0.1%, 0.15%, and 0.3% Sodium Hyaluronate with 0.05% Cyclosporine in the Treatment of Dry Eye.

Yuli Park, Jong Suk Song, Chul Young Choi, Kyung Chul Yoon, Hyung Keun Lee, Hyun Seung Kim

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04980144 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Diquafosol Ophthalmic Solution on Tear Film and Dry Eye Symptom in Type 2 Diabetic Dry Eye: A Four-week Randomized Control, Single Masked Pilot Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorHe Eye HospitalRan2023 to 2023Enrolled101ConditionsDiabetic Eye ProblemsArms3% Diquafosol tetrasodium, 0.1% hyaluronate
NCT05193331 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

3% Diquafosol Topical Ophthalmic Solution in Diabetic Patients With Dry Eye

TypeinterventionalSponsorHe Eye HospitalRan2023 to 2023Enrolled70ConditionsDiabetic Eye ProblemsArms3% Diquafosol tetrasodium
NCT05682547 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Single Center, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing the Clinical Efficacy of 3% Diquafosol Tetrasodium and 0.1 % Hyaluronic Acid 0.1% in Diabetic Patients With Dry Eye Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorHe Eye HospitalRan2022 to 2023Enrolled99ConditionsDiabetic Eye ProblemsArms3% Diquafosol tetrasodium, 0.1% hyaluronate
NCT06860659 phase4enrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of 0.28% Sodium Hyaluronate Eye Drops in Patient With Moderate to Severe Dry Eye : A Randomized Double-blind Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorDepartment of Medical Services Ministry of Public Health of ThailandRan2024 to 2025Enrolled84ConditionsDry Eye Disease (DED), Tear Break-Up Time, Tear Disorder, Tear Film InsufficiencyArms0.28% Sodium Hyaluronate , preservative free eye drops, 0.18% Sodium Hyaluronate , preservative free eye drops
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Topical diquafosol versus hyaluronic acid for the treatment of dry eye disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Performance and Safety of a Sodium Hyaluronate Tear Substitute with Polyethylene Glycol in Dry Eye Disease: A Multicenter, Investigator-Masked, Randomized, Noninferiority Trial.Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics · 2022
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Yuli Park1 Department of Ophthalmology, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea , Seoul, Korea.
Jong Suk Song2 Department of Ophthalmology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine , Seoul, Korea.
Chul Young Choi3 Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University , Seoul, Korea.
Kyung Chul Yoon4 Department of Ophthalmology, Chonnam National University Medical School , Gwangju, Korea.
Hyung Keun Lee5 The Institute of Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University College of Medicine , Seoul, Korea.
Hyun Seung Kim1 Department of Ophthalmology, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea , Seoul, Korea.
Catholic University of Korea · KRChonnam National University Hospital · KRKorea University Medical Center · KRSamsung Medical Center · KRThe Catholic University of Korea Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital · KRYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the efficacy of 0.1%, 0.15%, and 0.3% sodium hyaluronate (SH) artificial tears compared with 0.05% cyclosporine (CS) ophthalmic solution for the treatment of dry eye.

methodsOne hundred seventy-six patients were recruited and randomized to receive of 0.1%, 0.15%, and 0.3% SH and 0.05% CS. There was a primary end point which is the changes in the fluorescein corneal staining (FCS) score to determine noninferiority of 0.1%, 0.15%, and 0.3% SH. Secondary objective end points were lissamine green conjunctival staining (LGCS) scores, Schirmer test, and tear film break-up time (TBUT). Secondary subjective end point was ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score. These were evaluated before treatment and 6 and 12 weeks after start of treatment.

resultsIn the primary analysis, the mean change from baseline in FCS scores verified noninferiority of 0.1% and 0.15% SH to 0.05% CS and also indicated significant improvement of all groups (P < 0.05). Values for TBUT, LGCS scores, and OSDI scores showed significant improvements in all groups (P < 0.05), although no significant intergroup difference was shown. However, Schirmer test scores in the 0.15% SH group showed a significant tendency for better improvement at week 12 compared with the other groups (P < 0.05). No serious adverse events were observed.

conclusionsAdministration of 0.1%, 0.15%, and 0.3% SH was effective in improving both the objective signs and subjective symptoms of dry eye. Those findings, in addition to the well-tolerated profile of 0.1%, 0.15%, and 0.3% SH, show that it is effective therapeutic method for dry eye.

Indexed as

AdultCyclosporineDose-Response Relationship, DrugDry Eye SyndromesFemaleHumansHyaluronic AcidMaleMiddle AgedOphthalmic SolutionsCyclosporineHyaluronic AcidOphthalmic Solutions0.05% cyclosporine0.15% sodium hyaluronate0.1% sodium hyaluronate0.3% sodium hyaluronatedry eye syndrome

Identifiers

PMID27929721
PMCPMC5333559
OpenAlexW2560219168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.