Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27929715›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2017

Genome-wide screen of cell-cycle regulators in normal and tumor cells identifies a differential response to nucleosome depletion.

Maria Sokolova, Mikko Turunen, Oliver Mortusewicz, Teemu Kivioja, Patrick Herr, Anna Vähärautio, Mikael Björklund, Minna Taipale, Thomas Helleday, Jussi Taipale

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. PRMT5 activity sustains histone production to maintain genome integrity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Acute multi-level response to defectivebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Hinfp is a guardian of the somatic genome by repressing transposable elements.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Specificity landscapes unmask submaximal binding site preferences of transcription factors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria Sokolovaa Genome-Scale Biology Program, University of Helsinki , Helsinki , Finland.
Mikko Turunena Genome-Scale Biology Program, University of Helsinki , Helsinki , Finland.
Oliver Mortusewiczb Science for Life laboratory, Division of Translational Medicine and Chemical Biology, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics , Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden.
Teemu Kiviojaa Genome-Scale Biology Program, University of Helsinki , Helsinki , Finland.
Patrick Herrb Science for Life laboratory, Division of Translational Medicine and Chemical Biology, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics , Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden.
Anna Vähärautioa Genome-Scale Biology Program, University of Helsinki , Helsinki , Finland.
Mikael Björklunda Genome-Scale Biology Program, University of Helsinki , Helsinki , Finland.
Minna Taipalec Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics , Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden.
Thomas Helledayb Science for Life laboratory, Division of Translational Medicine and Chemical Biology, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics , Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden.
Jussi Taipalea Genome-Scale Biology Program, University of Helsinki , Helsinki , Finland.
University of Helsinki · FIScience for Life Laboratory · SEKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To identify cell cycle regulators that enable cancer cells to replicate DNA and divide in an unrestricted manner, we performed a parallel genome-wide RNAi screen in normal and cancer cell lines. In addition to many shared regulators, we found that tumor and normal cells are differentially sensitive to loss of the histone genes transcriptional regulator CASP8AP2. In cancer cells, loss of CASP8AP2 leads to a failure to synthesize sufficient amount of histones in the S-phase of the cell cycle, resulting in slowing of individual replication forks. Despite this, DNA replication fails to arrest, and tumor cells progress in an elongated S-phase that lasts several days, finally resulting in death of most of the affected cells. In contrast, depletion of CASP8AP2 in normal cells triggers a response that arrests viable cells in S-phase. The arrest is dependent on p53, and preceded by accumulation of markers of DNA damage, indicating that nucleosome depletion is sensed in normal cells via a DNA-damage -like response that is defective in tumor cells.

Indexed as

Cell CycleGenomeRNA InterferenceCell Cycle ProteinsCell Line, TumorDNADNA ReplicationGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Knockdown TechniquesHistonesHumansNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplasmsNucleosomesOsteosarcomaPhosphorylationCell Cycle ProteinsDNAH2AX protein, humanHistonesNeoplasm ProteinsNucleosomesRNA, Small InterferingTumor Suppressor Protein p53cancercell cyclechromatinDNA replicationfunctional genomicsnucleosome assemblyp53RNA interference

Identifiers

PMID27929715
PMCPMC5283814
OpenAlexW2951650356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.