Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27929527›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2017

Durations of second stage of labor and pushing, and adverse neonatal outcomes: a population-based cohort study.

A Sandström, M Altman, S Cnattingius, S Johansson, M Ahlberg, O Stephansson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Endorphins, Sexuality, and Reproduction.Advances in neurobiology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A SandströmClinical Epidemiology Unit, T2, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska University Hospital and Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
M AltmanClinical Epidemiology Unit, T2, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska University Hospital and Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
S CnattingiusClinical Epidemiology Unit, T2, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska University Hospital and Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
S JohanssonClinical Epidemiology Unit, T2, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska University Hospital and Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
M AhlbergClinical Epidemiology Unit, T2, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska University Hospital and Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
O StephanssonClinical Epidemiology Unit, T2, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska University Hospital and Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe associations between duration of second stage of labor, pushing time and risk of adverse neonatal outcomes are not fully established. Therefore, we aimed to examine such relationships. STUDY

designA population-based cohort study including 42 539 nulliparous women with singleton infants born in cephalic presentation at ⩾37 gestational weeks, using the Stockholm-Gotland Obstetric Cohort, Sweden, and the Swedish Neonatal Quality Register, 2008 to 2013. Poisson regression was used to analyze estimated adjusted relative risks (RRs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Outcome measures were umbilical artery acidosis (pH <7.05 and base excess <-12), birth asphyxia-related complications (including any of the following conditions: hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, hypothermia treatment, neonatal seizures, meconium aspiration syndrome or advanced resuscitation after birth) and admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

resultsOverall rates of umbilical artery acidosis, birth asphyxia-related complications and admission to NICU were 1.08, 0.63 and 6.42%, respectively. Rate of birth asphyxia-related complications gradually increased with duration of second stage: from 0.42% at <1 h to 1.29% at ≥4 h (adjusted RR 2.46 (95% CI 1.66 to 3.66)). For admission to NICU, corresponding rates were 4.97 and 9.45%, and adjusted RR (95% CI) was 1.80 (95% CI 1.58 to 2.04). Compared with duration of pushing <15 min, a duration of pushing ⩾60 min increased rates of acidosis from 0.57 to 1.69% (adjusted RR 2.55 (95% CI 1.51 to 4.30)).

conclusionProlonged durations of second stage of labor and pushing are associated with increased RRs of adverse neonatal outcomes. Clinical assessment of fetal well-being is essential when durations of second stage and pushing increases.

Indexed as

Pregnancy OutcomeAcidosisAdultAsphyxia NeonatorumCohort StudiesDatabases, FactualDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalLabor Stage, SecondObstetric Labor ComplicationsPatient AdmissionPregnancyPressure

Identifiers

PMID27929527
PMCPMC5339416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.