Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27929312›Full record

ArticleJournal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43)2017

Decision-making style and response to parental involvement in brief interventions for adolescent substance use.

Timothy F Piehler, Ken C Winters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Family-based prevention programmes for alcohol use in young people.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Evidence Base on Outpatient Behavioral Treatments for Adolescent Substance Use, 2014-2017: Outcomes, Treatment Delivery, and Promising Horizons.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Moderators of Substance Use Disorder Treatment for Adolescents.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Timothy F PiehlerDepartment of Family Social Science.
Ken C WintersDepartment of Psychiatry.

Funding

Scientific CoreP50DA027841 · NIDA · TREATMENT RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI CACCIOLA, JOHN S · 2010 to 2014
$10.7M
Brief Intervention for Alcohol Abusing StudentsR01AA014866 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI WINTERS, KEN C · 2005 to 2007
$706k
Brief Intervention for Drug Abusing StudentsR01DA017492 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI WINTERS, KEN C · 2003 to 2005
$668k
Adaptive Intervention Strategies: Advancing Research and Career DevelopmentK24DA035882 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI WINTERS, KEN C · 2013 to 2014
$331k
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA014866NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA035882NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA027841NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA017492
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescent decision making has been previously identified as risk factor for substance abuse as well as a proximal intervention target. The study sought to extend this research by evaluating the role of decision-making style in response to parent involvement in brief substance abuse interventions. Adolescents (aged 12 to 18 years; n = 259) identified in a school setting as abusing alcohol and marijuana were randomly assigned to complete 1 of 2 brief interventions (BIs), either a 2-session adolescent-only program (BI-A) or the 2-session adolescent program with an additional parent session (BI-AP). Interventions were manualized and delivered in a school setting by trained counselors. Adolescent decision-making style was evaluated at intake, and alcohol and marijuana use were evaluated at intake and at a 6-month follow-up assessment. Supporting past research with these interventions, BI-AP demonstrated overall stronger outcomes for marijuana when compared with BI-A. Across both intervention models, an adaptive decision-making style (i.e., constructive, rational) assessed at intake predicted greater reductions in marijuana use. A significant moderation effect emerged for alcohol outcomes. Adolescents with maladaptive decision-making tendencies (i.e., impulsive/careless, avoidant) demonstrated the largest benefit from the parental involvement in BI-AP, whereas those with a less impulsive style derived little additional benefit from parental involvement in regard to alcohol use outcomes. Implications for the tailoring of brief interventions for adolescent substance abuse are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

Decision MakingAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleParentingPsychotherapy, BriefSubstance-Related Disorders

Identifiers

PMID27929312
PMCPMC5378604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.