Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27929120›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Neurofilaments in blood and CSF for diagnosis and prediction of onset in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.

Petra Steinacker, Kaj Blennow, Steffen Halbgebauer, Song Shi, Viktoria Ruf, Patrick Oeckl, Armin Giese, Jens Kuhle, Dana Slivarichova, Henrik Zetterberg and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinical use and reporting of neurofilament quantification in neurological disorders: A global overview.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Neurofilaments contribution in clinic: state of the art.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Petra SteinackerDepartment of Neurology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Kaj BlennowInst. of Neuroscience and Physiology, Dept. of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.
Steffen HalbgebauerDepartment of Neurology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Song ShiCenter for Neuropathology and Prion Research, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
Viktoria RufCenter for Neuropathology and Prion Research, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
Patrick OecklDepartment of Neurology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Armin GieseCenter for Neuropathology and Prion Research, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
Jens KuhleNeurology, Departments of Medicine, Biomedicine and Clinical research, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Dana SlivarichovaDepartment of Prion Diseases, Slovak Medical University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Henrik ZetterbergInst. of Neuroscience and Physiology, Dept. of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.
Markus OttoDepartment of Neurology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Universität Ulm · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DESahlgrenska University Hospital · SESlovak Medical University · SKUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) are established and partly included in the diagnostic criteria, no blood biomarkers are available. Here, we assessed the utility of serum neurofilament light chain (NF-L) and tau protein in comparison to CSF markers (NF-L and phosphorylated NF heavy chain (pNF-H), tau, S100B, 14-3-3) and prion conversion assay (real-time quaking induced conversion (RT-QuIC)) for sporadic and genetic CJD. Importantly, a Gerstmann-Sträussler-Scheinker mutation carrier in the asymptomatic phase and at disease onset was included as well. Both NF-L and tau were markedly increased in CJD serum, reaching similar or even better performance as in CSF (sensitivity and specificity for serum NF-L 100% and 85.5%, and for serum tau 84.6% and 96.2%, respectively). Serum S100B showed high sensitivity as well (84.2%), but lower specificity (63%). CSF neurofilaments were increased before symptom onset, while prion seeding assay was negative. Just before a clinical diagnosis could be made, all CSF markers and NF-L in the serum were increased and CSF prion conversion assay was positive. The data suggest that neurofilaments are sensitive and specific blood markers for the diagnosis of genetic and sporadic CJD and might represent promising tools to predict disease onset.

Indexed as

AgedAge of OnsetBiomarkersCreutzfeldt-Jakob SyndromeFemaleHumansIntermediate FilamentsLimit of DetectionMaleMiddle AgedMutationBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID27929120
PMCPMC5144074
OpenAlexW2559843302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.