ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2017
Mapping the scientific research on non-point source pollution: a bibliometric analysis.
Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics in a paddy field-ditch-pond system in a typical polder area of southern China.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Biological and synthetic surfactant exposure increases antimicrobial gene occurrence in a freshwater mixed microbial biofilm environment.MicrobiologyOpen · 2023Article
- Spatial Pattern Evolution and Influencing Factors on Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollution in Small Town Areas under the Background of Rapid Industrialization.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Global research onWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2022Article
- A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Selenium in Drinking Water during the 1990-2021 Period: Treatment Options for Selenium Removal.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- A Bibliometric Analysis on Nonpoint Source Pollution: Current Status, Development, and Future.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Predicting non-point source of pollution in Maithon reservoir using a semi-distributed hydrological model.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2019Article
- Global scientific trends on aflatoxin research during 1998-2017: a bibliometric and visualized study.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2019Article
- Article
- Comments on "Mapping the scientific research on non-point source pollution: a bibliometric analysis" by Yang et al. (2017).Environmental science and pollution research international · 2018Article
- Nonpoint Pollution Source-Sink Landscape Pattern Change Analysis in a Coastal River Basin in Southeast China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Article
- Benchmarking the scientific research on wastewater-energy nexus by using bibliometric analysis.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A bibliometric analysis was conducted to examine the progress and future research trends of non-point source (NPS) pollution during the years 1991-2015 based on the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-Expanded) of Web of Science (WoS). The publications referencing NPS pollution were analyzed including the following aspects: document type, publication language, publication output and characteristics, subject category, source journal, distribution of country and institution, author keywords, etc. The results indicate that the study of NPS pollution demonstrated a sharply increasing trend since 1991. Article and English were the most commonly used document type and language. Environmental sciences and ecology, water resources, and engineering were the top three subject categories. Water science and technology ranked first in distribution of journal, followed by Science of the total environment and Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. The USA took a leading position in both quantity and quality, playing an important role in the research field of NPS pollution, followed by the UK and China. The most productive institution was the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Acad Sci), followed by Beijing Normal University and US Department of Agriculture's Agricultural Research Service (USDA ARS). The analysis of author keywords indicates that the major hotspots of NPS pollution from 1991 to 2015 contained "water," "model," "agriculture," "nitrogen," "phosphorus," etc. The results provide a comprehensive understanding of NPS pollution research and help readers to establish the future research directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27928755What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.